Well, I don't see the difference, but if I put it this way: I would be -1 to release Maven 3.1.2 requiring Java 1.6. One shouldn't bump platform requirements in a patch version - a patch version should be a drop-in replacement.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > You're voting for the wrong thing. It was already decided and announced > that when we cut 3.2 after Sep 30th it would be 1.6 > > The decision is: should the next release be 3.2 or 3.1.2? To my mind that > is a commit that Jason should just push and if somebody objects to the > commit they get to maintain the 3.1.x branch ;-) > > On Monday, 7 October 2013, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> +1 to 1.6 for 3.2 >> >> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> > Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if >> I update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Jason >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >> > Jason van Zyl >> > Founder, Apache Maven >> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Dennis Lundberg >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> >> > > -- > Sent from my phone -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
