Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean...

3.0.5 -> 3.1.0 was not a patch release, it was a minor release.
See http://semver.org/ for descriptions of the words I used.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Manfred Moser <[email protected]> wrote:
> True... but we already did the same when moving from Maven 3.0.5 to 3.1.0,
> which is not a drop in replacement... so it would be consistent ;-)
>
> manfred
>
>> Well, I don't see the difference, but if I put it this way:
>> I would be -1 to release Maven 3.1.2 requiring Java 1.6.
>> One shouldn't bump platform requirements in a patch version - a patch
>> version should be a drop-in replacement.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Stephen Connolly
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> You're voting for the wrong thing. It was already decided and announced
>>> that when we cut 3.2 after Sep 30th it would be 1.6
>>>
>>> The decision is: should the next release be 3.2 or 3.1.2? To my mind
>>> that
>>> is a commit that Jason should just push and if somebody objects to the
>>> commit they get to maintain the 3.1.x branch ;-)
>>>
>>> On Monday, 7 October 2013, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to 1.6 for 3.2
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jason van Zyl
>>>> <[email protected]<javascript:;>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind
>>>> if
>>>> I update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> >
>>>> > Jason
>>>> >
>>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > Jason van Zyl
>>>> > Founder,  Apache Maven
>>>> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dennis Lundberg
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> <javascript:;>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my phone
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dennis Lundberg
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>



-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to