True... but we already did the same when moving from Maven 3.0.5 to 3.1.0,
which is not a drop in replacement... so it would be consistent ;-)

manfred

> Well, I don't see the difference, but if I put it this way:
> I would be -1 to release Maven 3.1.2 requiring Java 1.6.
> One shouldn't bump platform requirements in a patch version - a patch
> version should be a drop-in replacement.
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Stephen Connolly
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You're voting for the wrong thing. It was already decided and announced
>> that when we cut 3.2 after Sep 30th it would be 1.6
>>
>> The decision is: should the next release be 3.2 or 3.1.2? To my mind
>> that
>> is a commit that Jason should just push and if somebody objects to the
>> commit they get to maintain the 3.1.x branch ;-)
>>
>> On Monday, 7 October 2013, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to 1.6 for 3.2
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jason van Zyl
>>> <[email protected]<javascript:;>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind
>>> if
>>> I update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Jason
>>> >
>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> > Jason van Zyl
>>> > Founder,  Apache Maven
>>> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dennis Lundberg
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> <javascript:;>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my phone
>
>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to