Hi Ben,

I see that you've already submitted this review
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17001/, but could answer my question above?

It's possible that you didn't receive it because I sent it through my
Twitter email acct which is prone to being caught by email filters.

Thanks,
Dave



On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Dave Lester <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
> Is there a previous thread you can point us to? I'd like to understand the
> concern more. For most users, I think having a .gitignore file is the
> most-convenient way to manage your code in development. If people want to
> see ignored files, it's easy to run:
>
> git status --ignored
>
> What do you think?
>
> Dave
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Benjamin Hindman 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> People have asked about this before. Some people don't want .gitignore
>> files because they like to see everything that's in their directories,
>> including generated files so they have a better idea of when something was
>> supposed to get generated but didn't, etc.
>>
>> In the past people have simply added their own .gitignore (adding
>> '.gitignore' to it as well so it ignores itself). Someone once proposed
>> committing a .gitignore-template (or something similarly named) that a
>> developer can copy to .gitignore if they choose to (but this doesn't force
>> people that don't want .gitignore to use it).
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Dave Lester <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > This makes sense to me.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Charlie Carson <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey guys, is it good / bad / different if we were to add the files
>> that
>> > > automake generates and to put them into appropriate .gitignore files
>> and
>> > > check those in?
>> > >
>> > > I'm new to mesos dev, so probably missing context, but wanted to
>> double
>> > > check instead of just working around it for myself.
>> > >
>> > > if it does make sense then I'd be happy to create the JIRA and initial
>> > CR.
>> > >
>> > > thanks,
>> > > cc
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> @davelester
> Open Source Advocate | Twitter, Inc
>

Reply via email to