> On May 5, 2014, 9:48 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 137
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/diff/2/?file=574065#file574065line137>
> >
> >     Shouldn't this be a hostname?
> 
> Benjamin Hindman wrote:
>     I wasn't convinced that a hostname would be sufficient. For example, in 
> the event that we have internal containers that we're trying to query that 
> have private IP addresses (i.e., via Docker) it seemed like it was possible 
> we'd want to run mesos-health-checker both outside of such a container (in 
> which case the NAT'ing might be sufficient) or inside of a container in which 
> case it seemed like having an IP might be nice. I could have both with some 
> semantics about what to do if both are present.
> 
> Niklas Nielsen wrote:
>     I was thinking along the lines of an full URL instead of ip + port + 
> path. That could accommodate hostname _and_ ip's too, would capture 
> http/https, port, login and so on. Are their downsides I am missing?

+1 Niklas.  A full URL would be the most flexible here, and schedulers could 
readily derive this value at launchTasks() time.


- Connor


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/#review42207
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 3, 2014, 6:38 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2014, 6:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-741
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-741
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto e48e50aae248bd9d5289dbaa36753be53b2e592a 
>   src/master/master.cpp c79fdafde6b08d74e6fea71afa79aded41b3a9ab 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to