-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/#review42552
-----------------------------------------------------------



include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/#comment76358>

    port, path, ssl could be nicely captured in a URL



include/mesos/mesos.proto
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/#comment76359>

    It's pretty common to accept 200-399 per default. Some folks will be 
surprised if we silently accept errors as healthy. I also can't think of a use 
case where you would want to redefine 4xx and 5xx as healthy. Maybe just remove 
statuses altogether?


- Tobi Knaup


On May 8, 2014, 7:42 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2014, 7:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-741
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-741
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto e48e50aae248bd9d5289dbaa36753be53b2e592a 
>   src/master/master.cpp bfe48bc2fd9528db2888ea472932a92dd8b106eb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21052/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to