> On July 11, 2014, 6:49 p.m., Connor Doyle wrote:
> > src/launcher/executor.cpp, line 320
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22579/diff/9/?file=614436#file614436line320>
> >
> >     Here, when Mesos kills an unhealthy task on the framework's behalf, it 
> > emits a StatusUpdate with a task state of TASK_KILLED.  Is the `healthy` 
> > field also set to `false` in this case?  It would be great to allow 
> > schedulers to know why the task was killed.

Hi Connor, that makes sense, let me create another patch for that.


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22579/#review47668
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 20, 2014, 10:58 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22579/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 20, 2014, 10:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added task health check process that is launched with the command executor if 
> health check is configured.
> It runs configured health check command and return the status to the executor 
> to report the task health. The executor also reports the task health status 
> back to the scheduler.
> 
> The task health process keeps internal state based on health check 
> configuration, and determine when the task it is checking for should be 
> killed. Currently it's based on the number of consecutive failures it 
> observed. Once the condition meets it sends a task health status update with 
> a kill task flag turned on, and the executor will kill the task.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 2f6be05 
>   src/Makefile.am b1b7d2d 
>   src/common/status_utils.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/common/type_utils.hpp 27ea4d2 
>   src/health-check/main.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp 3d55d93 
>   src/master/master.cpp dcf28ad 
>   src/messages/messages.proto 8aecc8b 
>   src/slave/containerizer/external_containerizer.cpp 96c434b 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp ed3483f 
>   src/tests/health_check_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/script.cpp d57fc7d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22579/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit tests and make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to