> On Nov. 18, 2014, 11:55 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 403 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27550/diff/3/?file=767713#file767713line403> > > > > I'm kind of going back and forth about whether or not we should have a > > Persistence nested protobuf message. At first I was thinking no, but now > > I'm thinking that we might want to specify other things. For example, maybe > > we want to introduce a way to persist this for some duration but no longer. > > Who knows, but maybe it's better to just have it behind the Persistence > > message that you originally had.
+1. That way a release call can take Persistence protobuf too. - Vinod ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27550/#review62056 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 18, 2014, 8:05 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27550/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 18, 2014, 8:05 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, switched to > 'mcypark', and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 35b91180f4e317c47dfdd18e9f7fca28143ae8f5 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27550/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Jie Yu > >
