-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#review70863
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticator.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#comment116311>

    Shouldn't you still check if the authenticator has been initialized? An 
ignorant developer might try to call authenticate without calling initialize



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#comment116375>

    If we change `authenticator->terminate(pid)` to `future.discard()`, and the 
future has actually become Ready, will a call to future.discard() still call 
the onDiscard handler? Because what we really want is just to erase the session 
from the map so that the Owned pointer drops to 0 refs and the session 
self-destructs.



src/master/master.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#comment116378>

    Can we tie the authenticator's future to the master's `authenticating` 
future? Does that even make sense? Do they always have the same 
lifetime/effects?



src/tests/cram_md5_authentication_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/#comment116380>

    Did you mean "cancel the authentication process"? How about "discard..."?


- Adam B


On Feb. 3, 2015, 3:05 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 3, 2015, 3:05 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Kapil Arya, Niklas Nielsen, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2050
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2050
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The initial design and implementation of the authenticator module interface 
> caused issues and was not optimal for heavy lifting setup of external 
> dependencies. By introducing a two fold design, this has been decoupled from 
> the authentication message processing. The new design also gets us back on 
> track to the goal of makeing SASL a soft dependency of mesos.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/authentication/authenticator.hpp 460494a 
>   src/authentication/cram_md5/authenticator.hpp d739a02 
>   src/authentication/cram_md5/auxprop.hpp b894386 
>   src/authentication/cram_md5/auxprop.cpp cf503a2 
>   src/master/master.hpp 337e00a 
>   src/master/master.cpp 1005686 
>   src/tests/cram_md5_authentication_tests.cpp a356aa1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27760/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Till Toenshoff
> 
>

Reply via email to