> On March 11, 2015, noon, Ben Mahler wrote:
> > I'm curious, what prompted this change?

a comment on the original version in a review that it wasn't the best way of 
counting bits. it seems like a generally useful thing to do.


> On March 11, 2015, noon, Ben Mahler wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/bits.hpp, line 25
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31677/diff/5/?file=890606#file890606line25>
> >
> >     Can we return a size_t to capture that this is a count and that 
> > negatives are not possible?
> >     
> >     Is `bits::count` not a sufficient name?

as per the style guide, 
http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.html#Integer_Types, 
"You should not use the unsigned integer types such as uint32_t, unless there 
is a valid reason such as representing a bit pattern rather than a number, or 
you need defined overflow modulo 2^N. In particular, do not use unsigned types 
to say a number will never be negative. Instead, use assertions for this."

there may be a countUnsetBits in the future. Maybe countSet, but we could 
bikeshed all day :)


- Dominic


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31677/#review76105
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 10, 2015, 12:59 p.m., Evelina Dumitrescu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31677/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 10, 2015, 12:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Dominic Hamon, Jie Yu, Joris Van 
> Remoortere, and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see summary
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/Makefile.am 
> a5224554f6851930aa97cadc5da3d010829d87dc 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/Makefile.am 
> ac2bbed6fe86623fb51cac3613d79d7b1372df9d 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/bits.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/ip.hpp 
> e4e86deb8a42a1d91f4d4ac210eae26f8f57ee17 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/bits_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31677/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Evelina Dumitrescu
> 
>

Reply via email to