----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#review79902 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129495> Why not use a random username here, like a UUID. Or, check if the user exist. src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129491> unused? src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129492> unused? src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129488> indentation src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129489> unused? src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129490> unused? src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/#comment129494> indentation - Ian Downes On April 13, 2015, 9:55 a.m., Jim Klucar wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 13, 2015, 9:55 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1790 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1790 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added chown to CommandInfo.URI protocol buffer as an optional > boolean that defaults to true, the current chown behavior. > > The fetcher was updated to skip the os::chown operation if the chown > boolean is set to false. > > No documentation was updated. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 3c592d5ab3092ecbeddfaff95e0c1addc3ac58f8 > src/common/type_utils.cpp e92f6f36de0955784619029a016667b46bbe221b > src/launcher/fetcher.cpp 796526f59c25898ef6db2b828b0e2bb7b172ba25 > src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp 4549e6a631e2c17cec3766efaa556593eeac9a1e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32975/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Unit testing this functionality is difficult because it would require that > the user running the test to have permission to chown a file to someone other > than themselves. I didn't want to add that as a requirement to build. I added > the new field to the existing test cases just to see that they populate. > > > Thanks, > > Jim Klucar > >
