-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#review80576
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130628>

    Not sure what would be correct but I guess it would be right to use a 
lower-case "d" for "docker" in all comments. Right now we have both variants in 
this patch.



src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130623>

    s/checkpoint/checkpoints/



src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130624>

    s/docker/the docker/



src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130631>

    Reference to temporary is going to be a nono :) - see  
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33271



src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130632>

    Why did you move this up?



src/tests/containerizer_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130630>

    s/Mesos/mesos/



src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/#comment130629>

    s/docker/the docker/


- Till Toenshoff


On April 17, 2015, 7:07 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 17, 2015, 7:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Bernd Mathiske, Ian Downes, Jie 
> Yu, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2601
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2601
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed recover tasks only by the intiated containerizer.
> Currently both mesos and docker containerizer recovers tasks that wasn't 
> started by themselves.
> The proposed fix is to record the intended containerizer in the checkpointed 
> executorInfo, and reuse that information on recover to know if the 
> containerizer should recover or not. We are free to modify the executorInfo 
> since it's not being used to relaunch any task.
> The external containerizer doesn't need to change since it is only recovering 
> containers that are returned by the containers script.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp 6893684e6d199a5d69fc8bba8e60c4acaae9c3c9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp f9fb07806e3b7d7d2afc1be3b8756eac23b32dcd 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> e4136095fca55637864f495098189ab3ad8d8fe7 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp a0595f93ce4720f5b9926326d01210460ccb0667 
>   src/tests/containerizer_tests.cpp 5991aa628083dac7c5e8bf7ba297f4f9edeec05f 
>   src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> c772d4c836de18b0e87636cb42200356d24ec73d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33257/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to