> On Feb. 11, 2015, 5:27 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/examples/test_hook_module.cpp, line 120
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29947/diff/7/?file=837750#file837750line120>
> >
> >     Why would this get called multiple times?
> 
> Kapil Arya wrote:
>     If for example, someone writes a test case that installs all hooks but 
> verifies only a subset of them.  However, this concern would be mitigated 
> once we use libprocess events.

Removed in the latest patch.


> On Feb. 11, 2015, 5:27 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/tests/hook_tests.cpp, line 94
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29947/diff/7/?file=837751#file837751line94>
> >
> >     This whole promise lookup looks wrong to me. Is there any other way we 
> > can get the Promise/Future exposed through the module API? Maybe just add a 
> > "Future<something> executed()" or whatever?
> 
> Kapil Arya wrote:
>     Should not be a concern (see above).

Removed in the lates diff.


> On Feb. 11, 2015, 5:27 a.m., Adam B wrote:
> > src/tests/hook_tests.cpp, lines 302-305
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29947/diff/7/?file=837751#file837751line302>
> >
> >     Did you consider just sending an explicit ShutdownExecutorMessage from 
> > the slave to the executor? Then you can wait around for the hook to 
> > complete without worrying about the master/slave/framework shutting down in 
> > the meantime.

I haven't considered the explicit message. I will try to find a prior example 
and adjust accordingly.


- Kapil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29947/#review71946
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 21, 2015, 2:44 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29947/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 21, 2015, 2:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2226
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2226
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There is currently no good way to synchronize between the test body and the 
> hook code, so we wire a promise (owned by the test code). The technical debt 
> is covered by the following JIRA issue:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2641
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/examples/test_hook_module.cpp 2f2da1c5ef85af06c7f366d38ce5b64f39d0076f 
>   src/tests/hook_tests.cpp bb9de25bd2c4601d333a3ca1aec13820c7df7378 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29947/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kapil Arya
> 
>

Reply via email to