+1 for weekly. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <ar...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> +1 for weekly. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for bi-weekly > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > >> (once every 2 weeks). > >> > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync > >> today. > >> > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting > won't > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. > >> > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in these > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces people's time > >> commitments. > >> > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas you might > have! > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> MPark. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Haosdent Huang > -- *Jan Schlicht* Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
