+1 for bi-weekly.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg <elizab...@mesosphere.io>
wrote:

> +1 Weekly
>
> -Elizabeth
>
> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see
> > how people are liking it.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Guangya
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer <dmer...@fantoccini.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always
> > > reset
> > > > to biweekly.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for bi-weekly.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan <
> > > > ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 for weekly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park <
> > mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or
> > > > > bi-weekly
> > > > > > > >> (once every 2 weeks).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> There were differing opinions on the subject during the
> > > community
> > > > > sync
> > > > > > > >> today.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing
> a
> > > > > meeting
> > > > > > > won't
> > > > > > > >> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved in
> > > these
> > > > > > > >> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces
> > > people's
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > >> commitments.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas
> you
> > > > might
> > > > > > > have!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> MPark.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > Haosdent Huang
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Jan Schlicht*
> > > > > > Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to