+1 bi-weekly
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 for bi-weekly > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.com> wrote: > >> +1 for bi-weekly. >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg <elizab...@mesosphere.io >>> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 Weekly >>> >>> -Elizabeth >>> >>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann <g...@mesosphere.io> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to >> see >>>> how people are liking it. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Guangya >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer < >> dmer...@fantoccini.com >>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can >> always >>>>> reset >>>>>> to biweekly. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io >>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht <j...@mesosphere.io >>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan < >>>>>> ar...@mesosphere.io <javascript:;>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for weekly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent < >> haosd...@gmail.com >>>> <javascript:;>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> +1 for bi-weekly >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park < >>>> mcyp...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly >> or >>>>>>> bi-weekly >>>>>>>>>>> (once every 2 weeks). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There were differing opinions on the subject during the >>>>> community >>>>>>> sync >>>>>>>>>>> today. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and >> missing >>> a >>>>>>> meeting >>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>> be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> An argument for bi-weekly: there are many people involved >> in >>>>> these >>>>>>>>>>> meetings, we should keep it infrequent so that it reduces >>>>> people's >>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>> commitments. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This email is intended to capture your +1s or other ideas >>> you >>>>>> might >>>>>>>>> have! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> MPark. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Haosdent Huang >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> *Jan Schlicht* >>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Engineer, Mesosphere >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
