I think releasing is a good idea. I'm personally still testing the latest java 9 through 11 related changes and maybe will come up with some findings based on those changes. So I would like a little time for that.
I personally think 5.2.0 would be the best option for the version, because the introduction of java 9 through 11 support is quite a step up from my perspective. Kind regards, Arjan Seijkens -----Original Message----- From: Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 5:54 AM To: dev@metamodel.apache.org Subject: I'd like to release. You agree? And what should we name the version? Hi all, I'd like to release MetaModel rather soon. In the current master branch we have these two changes ready: * [METAMODEL-1205] - Updated build and dependencies to be JDK8-11 compatible. Important updates include Guava, POI, Cassandra, Hadoop. * [METAMODEL-1206] - Solved Maven version dependent unit test issues in ElasticSearch-native module. They're both pretty much internal, except that the dependency updates are going to be pretty significant for anyone upgrading from version 5.1.0 (or other recent releases) as their transitive dependencies will likely get upgraded as well. So that brings up the quesion about what to name a new release. On one hand it's almost a non-functional upgrade, so we could go with version name *5.1.1*. on the other hand it updates the supported and required versions of dependencies a lot. So I think I personally think it should be version *5.2.0*. What do you think? - Kasper
