I would bump to 5.2.0 taking into account the updated deps to be JDK8-11 compatible.
El mar., 4 dic. 2018 a las 8:10, Arjan Seijkens (<a.seijk...@quadient.com>) escribió: > I think releasing is a good idea. I'm personally still testing the latest > java 9 through 11 related changes and maybe will come up with some findings > based on those changes. So I would like a little time for that. > > I personally think 5.2.0 would be the best option for the version, because > the introduction of java 9 through 11 support is quite a step up from my > perspective. > > Kind regards, > Arjan Seijkens > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 5:54 AM > To: dev@metamodel.apache.org > Subject: I'd like to release. You agree? And what should we name the > version? > > Hi all, > > I'd like to release MetaModel rather soon. In the current master branch we > have these two changes ready: > > * [METAMODEL-1205] - Updated build and dependencies to be JDK8-11 > compatible. Important updates include Guava, POI, Cassandra, Hadoop. > * [METAMODEL-1206] - Solved Maven version dependent unit test issues in > ElasticSearch-native module. > > They're both pretty much internal, except that the dependency updates are > going to be pretty significant for anyone upgrading from version 5.1.0 (or > other recent releases) as their transitive dependencies will likely get > upgraded as well. > > So that brings up the quesion about what to name a new release. On one > hand it's almost a non-functional upgrade, so we could go with version name > *5.1.1*. on the other hand it updates the supported and required versions > of dependencies a lot. So I think I personally think it should be version > *5.2.0*. What do you think? > > - Kasper >
