I apologize forgot to mention this in rc1 attempt =( Once we get the first release under ASF I believe it would be much easier more later releases. Thanks for being patience guys
- Henry On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ankit, > > The link is for publishing maven artifacts bit in this case we need to Vote > on source jars because Apache only officially vote on source files. As Noah > mentioned you need to put the source files into your people.apache.org > public URL. > > Please take a look at Apache Spark vote thread: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201309.mbox/%3CCABPQxsu6XwYMUxWKwRsXOvT+3-8=TTWwyHwJe_hWVb=npxw...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Ankit Kumar wrote: >> >> Hi Noah, >> >> The release procedure followed is standard Apache release process. I have >> followed steps as documented here: - >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#dev-env >> >> Since there were not any project specific setting/steps I did not make a >> new WIKI. >> >> I shared the public key link as that was in the Vote thread template I >> received from Henry. My key ID is B68FA0EF. >> >> Regarding the artifacts, the link I shared is the staging repository link >> under which all the artifacts are available as jar/archives etc and they >> are signed by my key. This is what comes out automatically by the Apache >> release process. In the first attempt Vote thread received some feedback >> remarks from Arvind but he did mention the signature and md5 checks passed >> on the artifacts. >> >> P.S. Excuse me if I don't really understand you as this is the first time >> I >> do an Apache release. >> >> Regards >> Ankit >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Do you have your release procedure written down on the wiki somewhere? >> > I'd like to look at it. >> > >> > We should prepare some test instructions on the wiki and link to that >> > too, so people voting know what to check for. >> > >> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc >> > >> > I would prefer it if you gave the key ID and let me fetch it myself >> > with gpg --recv-keys. >> > >> > > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/ >> > >> > We cannot vote on this. We can only vote on a prepared source >> > artefact, like a zip file. This file is what should be signed by your >> > GPG key. >> > >> > You mention "release artefact" in your email though, so maybe I am >> > missing something? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > On 3 December 2013 16:05, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >> > > Metamodel(incubating) version 4.0.0. >> > > This will be the first incubator release for MetaModel project in >> > > Apache. >> > > NOTE: This release contains fixes for issues as reported in the first >> > > release attempt vote thread. >> > > >> > > The tag to be voted on is v4.0.0-incubating : >> > > >> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating >> > > >> > > >> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc >> > > >> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> > > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/ >> > > >> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel >> > 4.0.0-incubating. >> > > The vote is open until <6th December 2013 16:00 CET> and passes if a >> > > majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast. >> > > >> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> > > >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > Ankit >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Noah Slater >> > https://twitter.com/nslater >> >
