The source zip file would be:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
You can build (and run unittests etc.) if you unzip, enter the directory
and use maven to build ("mvn install" from command line)
2013/12/4 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
> Which source file(s) are we voting on? Note that votes are attached to
> specific files.
>
> On 4 December 2013 20:40, Kasper Sørensen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The source zip file can be found in this directory of the staged maven
> > repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
> >
> > (So that part should definately be documented in the wiki I guess?)
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/4 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
> >
> >> The first release is typically the most painful one you'll ever do. :)
> >>
> >> On 4 December 2013 18:21, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > I apologize forgot to mention this in rc1 attempt =(
> >> >
> >> > Once we get the first release under ASF I believe it would be much
> >> > easier more later releases. Thanks for being patience guys
> >> >
> >> > - Henry
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Henry Saputra <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Hi Ankit,
> >> >>
> >> >> The link is for publishing maven artifacts bit in this case we need
> to
> >> Vote
> >> >> on source jars because Apache only officially vote on source files.
> As
> >> Noah
> >> >> mentioned you need to put the source files into your
> people.apache.org
> >> >> public URL.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please take a look at Apache Spark vote thread:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201309.mbox/%3CCABPQxsu6XwYMUxWKwRsXOvT+3-8=TTWwyHwJe_hWVb=npxw...@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Ankit Kumar wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi Noah,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The release procedure followed is standard Apache release process. I
> >> have
> >> >>> followed steps as documented here: -
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#dev-env
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Since there were not any project specific setting/steps I did not
> make
> >> a
> >> >>> new WIKI.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I shared the public key link as that was in the Vote thread
> template I
> >> >>> received from Henry. My key ID is B68FA0EF.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regarding the artifacts, the link I shared is the staging repository
> >> link
> >> >>> under which all the artifacts are available as jar/archives etc and
> >> they
> >> >>> are signed by my key. This is what comes out automatically by the
> >> Apache
> >> >>> release process. In the first attempt Vote thread received some
> >> feedback
> >> >>> remarks from Arvind but he did mention the signature and md5 checks
> >> passed
> >> >>> on the artifacts.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> P.S. Excuse me if I don't really understand you as this is the first
> >> time
> >> >>> I
> >> >>> do an Apache release.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>> Ankit
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Do you have your release procedure written down on the wiki
> >> somewhere?
> >> >>> > I'd like to look at it.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > We should prepare some test instructions on the wiki and link to
> that
> >> >>> > too, so people voting know what to check for.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > I would prefer it if you gave the key ID and let me fetch it
> myself
> >> >>> > with gpg --recv-keys.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > We cannot vote on this. We can only vote on a prepared source
> >> >>> > artefact, like a zip file. This file is what should be signed by
> your
> >> >>> > GPG key.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > You mention "release artefact" in your email though, so maybe I am
> >> >>> > missing something?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Thanks!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On 3 December 2013 16:05, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> > > Hi All,
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> >> >>> > > Metamodel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
> >> >>> > > This will be the first incubator release for MetaModel project
> in
> >> >>> > > Apache.
> >> >>> > > NOTE: This release contains fixes for issues as reported in the
> >> first
> >> >>> > > release attempt vote thread.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > The tag to be voted on is v4.0.0-incubating :
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >> >>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel
> >> >>> > 4.0.0-incubating.
> >> >>> > > The vote is open until <6th December 2013 16:00 CET> and passes
> if
> >> a
> >> >>> > > majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating
> >> >>> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Regards
> >> >>> > > Ankit
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Noah Slater
> >> >>> > https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Noah Slater
> >> https://twitter.com/nslater
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>
