We should use RC (release candidate) to indicate the attempts and
artifacts. Thats why I was proposing to sump the source to be reviewed
in people.apache.org directory.

The subject should be something like: [VOTE] Release Apache MetaModel
4.0.0-incubating (RC2)

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Kasper Sørensen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The source zip file would be:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> You can build (and run unittests etc.) if you unzip, enter the directory
> and use maven to build ("mvn install" from command line)
>
>
> 2013/12/4 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
>
>> Which source file(s) are we voting on? Note that votes are attached to
>> specific files.
>>
>> On 4 December 2013 20:40, Kasper Sørensen
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > The source zip file can be found in this directory of the staged maven
>> > repository:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>> >
>> > (So that part should definately be documented in the wiki I guess?)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/12/4 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> The first release is typically the most painful one you'll ever do. :)
>> >>
>> >> On 4 December 2013 18:21, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I apologize forgot to mention this in rc1 attempt =(
>> >> >
>> >> > Once we get the first release under ASF I believe it would be much
>> >> > easier more later releases. Thanks for being patience guys
>> >> >
>> >> > - Henry
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> Hi Ankit,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The link is for publishing maven artifacts bit in this case we need
>> to
>> >> Vote
>> >> >> on source jars because Apache only officially vote on source files.
>> As
>> >> Noah
>> >> >> mentioned you need to put the source files into your
>> people.apache.org
>> >> >> public URL.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please take a look at Apache Spark vote thread:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201309.mbox/%3CCABPQxsu6XwYMUxWKwRsXOvT+3-8=TTWwyHwJe_hWVb=npxw...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Ankit Kumar wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hi Noah,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The release procedure followed is standard Apache release process. I
>> >> have
>> >> >>> followed steps as documented here: -
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#dev-env
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Since there were not any project specific setting/steps I did not
>> make
>> >> a
>> >> >>> new WIKI.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I shared the public key link as that was in the Vote thread
>> template I
>> >> >>> received from Henry. My key ID is B68FA0EF.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Regarding the artifacts, the link I shared is the staging repository
>> >> link
>> >> >>> under which all the artifacts are available as jar/archives etc and
>> >> they
>> >> >>> are signed by my key. This is what comes out automatically by the
>> >> Apache
>> >> >>> release process. In the first attempt Vote thread received some
>> >> feedback
>> >> >>> remarks from Arvind but he did mention the signature and md5 checks
>> >> passed
>> >> >>> on the artifacts.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> P.S. Excuse me if I don't really understand you as this is the first
>> >> time
>> >> >>> I
>> >> >>> do an Apache release.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Regards
>> >> >>> Ankit
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> > Do you have your release procedure written down on the wiki
>> >> somewhere?
>> >> >>> > I'd like to look at it.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > We should prepare some test instructions on the wiki and link to
>> that
>> >> >>> > too, so people voting know what to check for.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > I would prefer it if you gave the key ID and let me fetch it
>> myself
>> >> >>> > with gpg --recv-keys.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > We cannot vote on this. We can only vote on a prepared source
>> >> >>> > artefact, like a zip file. This file is what should be signed by
>> your
>> >> >>> > GPG key.
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > You mention "release artefact" in your email though, so maybe I am
>> >> >>> > missing something?
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Thanks!
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On 3 December 2013 16:05, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> > > Hi All,
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> >> >>> > > Metamodel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> >> >>> > > This will be the first incubator release for MetaModel project
>> in
>> >> >>> > > Apache.
>> >> >>> > > NOTE: This release contains fixes for issues as reported in the
>> >> first
>> >> >>> > > release attempt vote thread.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > The tag to be voted on is v4.0.0-incubating :
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> >> >>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel
>> >> >>> > 4.0.0-incubating.
>> >> >>> > > The vote is open until <6th December 2013 16:00 CET> and passes
>> if
>> >> a
>> >> >>> > > majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MetaModel 4.0.0-incubating
>> >> >>> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > >
>> >> >>> > > Regards
>> >> >>> > > Ankit
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > --
>> >> >>> > Noah Slater
>> >> >>> > https://twitter.com/nslater
>> >> >>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Noah Slater
>> >> https://twitter.com/nslater
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Noah Slater
>> https://twitter.com/nslater
>>

Reply via email to