HI Ankit,

Any update about the next step or do you have any more questions or concerns?

As Matt Fanklin has mentioned before, could you please create a
documentation in MetaModel wiki[1] to record the steps taken to
prepare the release?
This could be done of course post release action item.

- Henry

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/metamodel/

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> [RESULT] for the [VOTE] thread Apache Metamodel release 4.0.0-incubating.
>
> +1
> Henry Saputra
> Juan Jose van der linden
> Arvind Prabhakar
> Matt Franklin
> Kasper Sorensen
> Ankit Kumar
> Hans Drexler
>
>
> Regards
> Ankit
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, so next step please send RESULT thread reply to the VOTE thread to
>> tally up the vote so we could bring the VOTE to the
>> [email protected] list to get final look or reviews by
>> incubating community and IPMCs.
>>
>> After that please send the same VOTE thread to
>> [email protected] and link to the RESULT thread for review.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Kasper Sørensen
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Register the tickets and finalize the release :-)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/12/25 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I guess we should make a ticket for fixing the headers in tests and
> make it
>> >> mandatory for next release.
>> >>
>> >> Lets make this our first release if all agree.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Ankit
>> >> On Dec 24, 2013 8:31 PM, "Henry Saputra" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hmm I missed that exclude comment you made before.
>> >> >
>> >> > @Ankit could you verify if we could fix the java test classes quickly
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tuesday, December 24, 2013, Matt Franklin wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Yes and the ticket to fix the license headers on test Java files.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Henry Saputra <
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > >wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Hi Matt,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Are you talking about config to ignore target classes and
> generated
>> >> > > files?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > - Henry
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Monday, December 23, 2013, Matt Franklin wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > If the tickets got created to update the RAT config, I will
> vote +1
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ankit Kumar <
>> >> > [email protected]<javascript:;>
>> >> > > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > > >wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Hi All,
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > We still need 1 more IPMC vote to promote this release.
> Please
>> >> > review
>> >> > > > and
>> >> > > > > > provide your feedback.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Regards
>> >> > > > > > Ankit
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <
>> >> > [email protected]<javascript:;>
>> >> > > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > +1
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Looks good to me too.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Regards,
>> >> > > > > > > Arvind Prabhakar
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Henry Saputra <
>> >> > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > > > > >wrote:
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > +1
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Looks good
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > - Henry
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Ankit Kumar <
>> >> > > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > Hi All,
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > After some discussions and agreements here I send
> again the
>> >> > > VOTE
>> >> > > > > > > > > thread, additionally added the location of the sources
> as
>> >> in
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > > > > > > > staging repository.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache
>> >> > > > > > > > > MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>> >> > > > > > > > > This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel
> in
>> >> > > Apache.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is
>> >> > > > > > > > > v4.0.0-incubating:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following
>> >> > > > > > > > > key:
>> >> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found
>> >> > > > > > > > > at:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Source jars can be found here:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache
> MetaModel
>> >> > > > > > > > 4.0.0-incubating.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > The vote is open until <17th December 2013 00:00 CET>
> and
>> >> > > passes
>> >> > > > > if a
>> >> > > > > > > > > majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Regards
>> >> > > > > > > > > Ankit
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>

Reply via email to