You have sent VOTE email to [email protected] list already? Hmm I don't think I saw it.
- Henry On Wednesday, January 8, 2014, Ankit Kumar wrote: > Hi Henry, > > Sent the email to general@incubator.... > > What are the next steps now? > > For the documentation I will pick that up and put some steps on wiki. > > For everyone's reference I have followed steps as here: - > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#dev-env > > Regards > Ankit > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Henry Saputra > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > >wrote: > > > HI Ankit, > > > > Any update about the next step or do you have any more questions or > > concerns? > > > > As Matt Fanklin has mentioned before, could you please create a > > documentation in MetaModel wiki[1] to record the steps taken to > > prepare the release? > > This could be done of course post release action item. > > > > - Henry > > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/metamodel/ > > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > [RESULT] for the [VOTE] thread Apache Metamodel release > 4.0.0-incubating. > > > > > > +1 > > > Henry Saputra > > > Juan Jose van der linden > > > Arvind Prabhakar > > > Matt Franklin > > > Kasper Sorensen > > > Ankit Kumar > > > Hans Drexler > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > Ankit > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Henry Saputra < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Ok, so next step please send RESULT thread reply to the VOTE thread to > > >> tally up the vote so we could bring the VOTE to the > > >> [email protected] list to get final look or reviews by > > >> incubating community and IPMCs. > > >> > > >> After that please send the same VOTE thread to > > >> [email protected] and link to the RESULT thread for > review. > > >> > > >> - Henry > > >> > > >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Kasper Sørensen > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Register the tickets and finalize the release :-) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2013/12/25 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> > > >> > > > >> >> Hi All, > > >> >> > > >> >> I guess we should make a ticket for fixing the headers in tests and > > > make it > > >> >> mandatory for next release. > > >> >> > > >> >> Lets make this our first release if all agree. > > >> >> > > >> >> Regards > > >> >> Ankit > > >> >> On Dec 24, 2013 8:31 PM, "Henry Saputra" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Hmm I missed that exclude comment you made before. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > @Ankit could you verify if we could fix the java test classes > > quickly > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Tuesday, December 24, 2013, Matt Franklin wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Yes and the ticket to fix the license headers on test Java > files. > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Henry Saputra < > > >> >> [email protected] > > >> >> > <javascript:;> > > >> >> > > >wrote: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Hi Matt, > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > Are you talking about config to ignore target classes and > > > generated > > >> >> > > files? > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > - Henry > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > On Monday, December 23, 2013, Matt Franklin wrote: > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > If the tickets got created to update the RAT config, I will > > > vote +1 > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > >
