I need first to upload those files then and wait 24 hours for the dist
server sync. But yes, will do that first.
Den 24/01/2014 21.02 skrev "Noah Slater" <[email protected]>:

> Aha. Could you add the MD5 and SHA1 links?
>
> On 24 January 2014 20:57, Kasper Sørensen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am simply looking for confirmation that the download link (and release
> > information in general) of the staged site is OK. If so it would be great
> > to make out 4.0.0 visible to everyone on the site and start telling about
> > it on social media etc. :-)
> > Den 24/01/2014 20.54 skrev "Noah Slater" <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> What do you mean about pushing to the staged site? Would you push to
> >> the actual site after? Any reason you can't just put these in the dist
> >> directory and update the live site immediately?
> >>
> >> On 24 January 2014 16:50, Kasper Sørensen
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > OK that's what I did. And the deps are compatible, we did a lot of
> checks
> >> > on that already (when we e.g. removed the access module because it
> didn't
> >> > have compatible deps).
> >> >
> >> > So then I think we have what we need?
> >> > Is it then ok If I publish the staged site?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014/1/24 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >> A zip file could be provided as a convenience binary. If the deps are
> >> >> compatible from a license perspective, you could include them too.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 23 January 2014 22:58, Kasper Sørensen
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> > Btw. a simple uber jar would not be sufficient since it would not
> >> contain
> >> >> > dependencies. It would maybe mean less JAR entries on your
> classpath
> >> but
> >> >> > will still not be functional without a minimum set of slf4j and
> maybe
> >> a
> >> >> few
> >> >> > other common libraries.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2014/1/23 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> So now I am a little bit confused... Can the zip file I created be
> >> used
> >> >> as
> >> >> >> a convenience downloadable binary item? I think it makes sense in
> >> this
> >> >> way?
> >> >> >> And it is quite consistent with e.g. how Apache Hadoop is being
> >> >> >> distributed.... Am I not right?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2014/1/23 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Yeah you are right there. Technically all the jar we add to the
> >> >> >>> staging repo for VOTE should not even considered for voting.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> As you have mentioned, ASF only vote on source files, so that is
> >> why I
> >> >> >>> think we could include the uber jar in the staging as part of
> >> proposed
> >> >> >>> release artifacts as convenience for testing and verify validity
> of
> >> >> >>> the package via hash check and sig).
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> - Henry
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Noah Slater <
> [email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > The uber jar includes third-party works and is a binary file,
> >> isn't
> >> >> >>> > it? We only ever vote on source files.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > My understanding of what this uber jar is tells me that it can
> be
> >> >> >>> > prepared by anyone, at any time, and made available to our
> >> community,
> >> >> >>> > as long as we don't call it a "release". And make it clear it
> is
> >> for
> >> >> >>> > convenience only, and not an official product of the PMC.
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > On 23 January 2014 19:57, Henry Saputra <
> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >> Yes, but I think we would like to include the uber jar as
> part of
> >> >> >>> >> release artifact next time.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> For this release, we do not have to put the uber jar since it
> was
> >> >> not
> >> >> >>> >> included in the VOTE thread.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> I would recommend put the "deps" libraries somewhere like in
> >> >> >>> >> people.apache.org and update the release note to indicate
> this.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> Any other thoughts?
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> - Henry
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Noah Slater <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>> If we're doing this, it's important to mark out the different
> >> >> >>> >>> locations in our download directory. One for the source
> >> *release*
> >> >> and
> >> >> >>> >>> the other for the convenience packages that project
> committers
> >> >> >>> >>> provide. We need to be careful about the wording here on the
> >> >> website
> >> >> >>> >>> too.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On 23 January 2014 17:42, Henry Saputra <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>> Ankit, could you help make sure ALL the artifacts used in
> the
> >> VOTE
> >> >> >>> are
> >> >> >>> >>>> released to the dist directory? Thanks!
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> Kasper, we could build "uber jar" to include all the
> >> dependencies
> >> >> in
> >> >> >>> >>>> one jar. Using something like Maven shade plugin [1] should
> do
> >> the
> >> >> >>> >>>> trick.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> - Henry
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Kasper Sørensen
> >> >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Not sure why the md5 and sha1 files are missing. Maybe
> Ankit
> >> >> simply
> >> >> >>> forgot
> >> >> >>> >>>>> to copy them over?
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Regarding the dep jars ... What I am thinking about is that
> >> say I
> >> >> >>> have my
> >> >> >>> >>>>> own build setup (e.g. with Ant or so) and I want to go
> >> download
> >> >> the
> >> >> >>> Spring
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Framework, Hibernate or any other substantial Java library
> >> with
> >> >> >>> >>>>> dependencies, then I usually find a bundle which contains
> >> >> >>> dependencies.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> That's very helpful if I just want to dump them into the
> >> >> classpath
> >> >> >>> and
> >> >> >>> >>>>> start compiling etc. How would a MetaModel user do that if
> we
> >> >> don't
> >> >> >>> provide
> >> >> >>> >>>>> these jars somehow?
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Of course the Maven users are blessed with the dependency
> >> >> >>> management, and
> >> >> >>> >>>>> that's also why I put the <dependency> snippet directly on
> the
> >> >> >>> website
> >> >> >>> >>>>> draft as well.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> 2014/1/23 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> We should not add those deps jars to the dist folder.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> We could write doc in the wiki on how to integrate with
> >> >> MetaModel
> >> >> >>> from
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> your project.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> Like if you use Maven the add MetaModel dependency in the
> >> >> pom.xml
> >> >> >>> that
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> should pull transitive dependencies on when building your
> >> Maven
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> project.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> - Henry
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Kasper Sørensen
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > I have a new draft available then:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > http://metamodel.staging.apache.org/index.html
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > Go to the section called "Download".
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > One specific doubt I have: Our build did not produce a
> >> >> finished
> >> >> >>> zip file
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > with all the JAR files in it (including the dependencies
> >> like
> >> >> >>> slf4j etc.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > which are only mentioned as maven <dependency>
> elements).
> >> So I
> >> >> >>> created
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> one
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > manually and put it here:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/metamodel/metamodel-4.0.0-incubating/packaged/
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > Along with my own armor/.asc file.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > Is that the right way to do it? Is the contents of this
> >> file
> >> >> >>> correct (in
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > the sense that it contains third party JARs in the lib
> >> >> folder)?
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > 2014/1/22 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> See this:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> On 22 January 2014 14:23, Kasper Sørensen
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > Thanks for the CouchDB example Noah. Will try to do
> >> >> something
> >> >> >>> similar.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > Now another "little thing" ... How do we get the
> >> >> downloadable
> >> >> >>> zip
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> files
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > etc. available on the download server of Apache? I
> see
> >> that
> >> >> >>> all large
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> files
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > go through a link like this:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/couchdb/binary/win/1.5.0/setup-couchdb-1.5.0_R16B02.exe
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > I imagine that's to support download mirrors etc...
> Is
> >> that
> >> >> >>> kinda
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> stuff
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > already taken care of by Ankit's release procedure,
> or
> >> do
> >> >> we
> >> >> >>> need to
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> do
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > something more for the distribution part of the
> release?
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > 2014/1/22 Noah Slater <[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> Congrats!
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar <
> >> >> >>> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > HI All,
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > The vote for Apache Metamodel 4.0.0-incubating is
> >> >> closed.
> >> >> >>> The vote
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> passes
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > with 4(+1) votes.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > Following IPMC votes were received.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > *+1*
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > hsaputra
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > mfranklin
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > arvind
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > nslater
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > Regards
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > Ankit
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> --
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> Noah Slater
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> --
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> Noah Slater
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> --
> >> >> >>> >>> Noah Slater
> >> >> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > --
> >> >> >>> > Noah Slater
> >> >> >>> > https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Noah Slater
> >> >> https://twitter.com/nslater
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Noah Slater
> >> https://twitter.com/nslater
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
>

Reply via email to