It seems that the dist.apache.org server is down at the moment so I cannot upload the md5+sha1 files right now.
But I did update the download section [1] on the staged site. It now includes also the source download link and corrected the wording to underline that the packaged zip is a convenience. [1] http://metamodel.staging.apache.org/#download 2014/1/24 Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > Yes we do use the svnpubsub for our dist directory. > > Sometimes there could be delay like few minutes. > > - Henry > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wait 24 hours? Are we not using SvnPubSub? It should be instantaneous. > > > > Grab me on Freenode, let's chat real time: nslater > > > > On 24 January 2014 21:04, Kasper Sørensen > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I need first to upload those files then and wait 24 hours for the dist > >> server sync. But yes, will do that first. > >> Den 24/01/2014 21.02 skrev "Noah Slater" <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> Aha. Could you add the MD5 and SHA1 links? > >>> > >>> On 24 January 2014 20:57, Kasper Sørensen > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > I am simply looking for confirmation that the download link (and > release > >>> > information in general) of the staged site is OK. If so it would be > great > >>> > to make out 4.0.0 visible to everyone on the site and start telling > about > >>> > it on social media etc. :-) > >>> > Den 24/01/2014 20.54 skrev "Noah Slater" <[email protected]>: > >>> > > >>> >> What do you mean about pushing to the staged site? Would you push to > >>> >> the actual site after? Any reason you can't just put these in the > dist > >>> >> directory and update the live site immediately? > >>> >> > >>> >> On 24 January 2014 16:50, Kasper Sørensen > >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> > OK that's what I did. And the deps are compatible, we did a lot of > >>> checks > >>> >> > on that already (when we e.g. removed the access module because it > >>> didn't > >>> >> > have compatible deps). > >>> >> > > >>> >> > So then I think we have what we need? > >>> >> > Is it then ok If I publish the staged site? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > 2014/1/24 Noah Slater <[email protected]> > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> A zip file could be provided as a convenience binary. If the > deps are > >>> >> >> compatible from a license perspective, you could include them > too. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On 23 January 2014 22:58, Kasper Sørensen > >>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >> > Btw. a simple uber jar would not be sufficient since it would > not > >>> >> contain > >>> >> >> > dependencies. It would maybe mean less JAR entries on your > >>> classpath > >>> >> but > >>> >> >> > will still not be functional without a minimum set of slf4j and > >>> maybe > >>> >> a > >>> >> >> few > >>> >> >> > other common libraries. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > 2014/1/23 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]> > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> So now I am a little bit confused... Can the zip file I > created be > >>> >> used > >>> >> >> as > >>> >> >> >> a convenience downloadable binary item? I think it makes > sense in > >>> >> this > >>> >> >> way? > >>> >> >> >> And it is quite consistent with e.g. how Apache Hadoop is > being > >>> >> >> >> distributed.... Am I not right? > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> 2014/1/23 Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> Yeah you are right there. Technically all the jar we add to > the > >>> >> >> >>> staging repo for VOTE should not even considered for voting. > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> As you have mentioned, ASF only vote on source files, so > that is > >>> >> why I > >>> >> >> >>> think we could include the uber jar in the staging as part of > >>> >> proposed > >>> >> >> >>> release artifacts as convenience for testing and verify > validity > >>> of > >>> >> >> >>> the package via hash check and sig). > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> - Henry > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Noah Slater < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> > The uber jar includes third-party works and is a binary > file, > >>> >> isn't > >>> >> >> >>> > it? We only ever vote on source files. > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > My understanding of what this uber jar is tells me that it > can > >>> be > >>> >> >> >>> > prepared by anyone, at any time, and made available to our > >>> >> community, > >>> >> >> >>> > as long as we don't call it a "release". And make it clear > it > >>> is > >>> >> for > >>> >> >> >>> > convenience only, and not an official product of the PMC. > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > On 23 January 2014 19:57, Henry Saputra < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >> Yes, but I think we would like to include the uber jar as > >>> part of > >>> >> >> >>> >> release artifact next time. > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> For this release, we do not have to put the uber jar > since it > >>> was > >>> >> >> not > >>> >> >> >>> >> included in the VOTE thread. > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> I would recommend put the "deps" libraries somewhere like > in > >>> >> >> >>> >> people.apache.org and update the release note to indicate > >>> this. > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> Any other thoughts? > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> - Henry > >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Noah Slater < > >>> >> [email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >>> If we're doing this, it's important to mark out the > different > >>> >> >> >>> >>> locations in our download directory. One for the source > >>> >> *release* > >>> >> >> and > >>> >> >> >>> >>> the other for the convenience packages that project > >>> committers > >>> >> >> >>> >>> provide. We need to be careful about the wording here on > the > >>> >> >> website > >>> >> >> >>> >>> too. > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> On 23 January 2014 17:42, Henry Saputra < > >>> >> [email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> Ankit, could you help make sure ALL the artifacts used > in > >>> the > >>> >> VOTE > >>> >> >> >>> are > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> released to the dist directory? Thanks! > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> Kasper, we could build "uber jar" to include all the > >>> >> dependencies > >>> >> >> in > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> one jar. Using something like Maven shade plugin [1] > should > >>> do > >>> >> the > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> trick. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> - Henry > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/ > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Kasper Sørensen > >>> >> >> >>> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Not sure why the md5 and sha1 files are missing. Maybe > >>> Ankit > >>> >> >> simply > >>> >> >> >>> forgot > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> to copy them over? > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Regarding the dep jars ... What I am thinking about is > that > >>> >> say I > >>> >> >> >>> have my > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> own build setup (e.g. with Ant or so) and I want to go > >>> >> download > >>> >> >> the > >>> >> >> >>> Spring > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Framework, Hibernate or any other substantial Java > library > >>> >> with > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> dependencies, then I usually find a bundle which > contains > >>> >> >> >>> dependencies. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> That's very helpful if I just want to dump them into > the > >>> >> >> classpath > >>> >> >> >>> and > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> start compiling etc. How would a MetaModel user do > that if > >>> we > >>> >> >> don't > >>> >> >> >>> provide > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> these jars somehow? > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> Of course the Maven users are blessed with the > dependency > >>> >> >> >>> management, and > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> that's also why I put the <dependency> snippet > directly on > >>> the > >>> >> >> >>> website > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> draft as well. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> 2014/1/23 Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> We should not add those deps jars to the dist folder. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> We could write doc in the wiki on how to integrate > with > >>> >> >> MetaModel > >>> >> >> >>> from > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> your project. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> Like if you use Maven the add MetaModel dependency in > the > >>> >> >> pom.xml > >>> >> >> >>> that > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> should pull transitive dependencies on when building > your > >>> >> Maven > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> project. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> - Henry > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Kasper Sørensen > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > I have a new draft available then: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > http://metamodel.staging.apache.org/index.html > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > Go to the section called "Download". > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > One specific doubt I have: Our build did not > produce a > >>> >> >> finished > >>> >> >> >>> zip file > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > with all the JAR files in it (including the > dependencies > >>> >> like > >>> >> >> >>> slf4j etc. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > which are only mentioned as maven <dependency> > >>> elements). > >>> >> So I > >>> >> >> >>> created > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> one > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > manually and put it here: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/metamodel/metamodel-4.0.0-incubating/packaged/ > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > Along with my own armor/.asc file. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > Is that the right way to do it? Is the contents of > this > >>> >> file > >>> >> >> >>> correct (in > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > the sense that it contains third party JARs in the > lib > >>> >> >> folder)? > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > 2014/1/22 Noah Slater <[email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> See this: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> On 22 January 2014 14:23, Kasper Sørensen > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > Thanks for the CouchDB example Noah. Will try to > do > >>> >> >> something > >>> >> >> >>> similar. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > Now another "little thing" ... How do we get the > >>> >> >> downloadable > >>> >> >> >>> zip > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> files > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > etc. available on the download server of Apache? > I > >>> see > >>> >> that > >>> >> >> >>> all large > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> files > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > go through a link like this: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > >>> > http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=/couchdb/binary/win/1.5.0/setup-couchdb-1.5.0_R16B02.exe > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > I imagine that's to support download mirrors > etc... > >>> Is > >>> >> that > >>> >> >> >>> kinda > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> stuff > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > already taken care of by Ankit's release > procedure, > >>> or > >>> >> do > >>> >> >> we > >>> >> >> >>> need to > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> do > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > something more for the distribution part of the > >>> release? > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > 2014/1/22 Noah Slater <[email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> Congrats! > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> On 21 January 2014 13:05, Ankit Kumar < > >>> >> >> >>> [email protected]> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > HI All, > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > The vote for Apache Metamodel > 4.0.0-incubating is > >>> >> >> closed. > >>> >> >> >>> The vote > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> passes > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > with 4(+1) votes. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > Following IPMC votes were received. > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > *+1* > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > hsaputra > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > mfranklin > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > arvind > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > nslater > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > Regards > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > Ankit > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> Noah Slater > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> Noah Slater > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> >>> Noah Slater > >>> >> >> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > > >>> >> >> >>> > -- > >>> >> >> >>> > Noah Slater > >>> >> >> >>> > https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> Noah Slater > >>> >> >> https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Noah Slater > >>> >> https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Noah Slater > >>> https://twitter.com/nslater > >>> > > > > > > > > -- > > Noah Slater > > https://twitter.com/nslater >
