OK that makes sense I guess. I would then suggest we go for 4.2.0 next time, since it's again adding a lot of stuff (and especially the part about making ColumnType an interface instead of an enum is a big change from compatibility POV). I'll update the CHANGES.txt file because that is currently a mess on master branch then :-P
2014-06-30 9:45 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: > Unfortunately that was not the way release in interpreted in ASF, the > RC is a release candidate number for 4.1.0. > So technically we have released 4.1.0 which delivered with RC1. > > I missed the subject of the email you sent out for the last MetaModel > release VOTE, which included the RC postfix. > Mea culpa from me, I assume you know that RC tags are just used to > discriminate different attempts to get particular release. > > We could do next 4.1.1 or 4.2.0. > > - Henry > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Kasper Sørensen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well in my opinion we only released "RC1", so one milestone on the way > > towards 4.1 ... But maybe that part needs more sharing of ideas etc. I > > would also be fine calling the next release 4.2 and then just skip the > > RC-suffix. > > > > > > 2014-06-30 6:49 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: > > > >> HI Kasper, > >> > >> Thanks for taking stab at the report. > >> > >> I believe 4.1.0 is out so I recommend change the status to "Apache > >> MetaModel 4.1.0-incubating was released on Jan 21. This time ..." > >> > >> For the "Three most important issues to address in the move towards > >> graduation" section, why no 2 is about finalize 4.1 release? > >> The 4.1.0 release is out already so we just need to mention about > >> having more releases to demonstrate understanding of ASF policies? > >> > >> - Henry > >> > >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Kasper Sørensen > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > How about something like this... > >> > - Kasper > >> > > >> > ---- > >> > > >> > MetaModel > >> > > >> > MetaModel is a data access framework, providing a common interface for > >> > exploration and querying of different types of datastores. > >> > > >> > MetaModel has been incubating since 2013-06-12. > >> > > >> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > >> > > >> > 1. More contributors to increase diversity of the community > >> > 2. Finalize 4.1 release to demonstrate new functionality and > evolution > >> > within Apache > >> > 3. Connect with other projects from Apache's ecosystem such as > HBase, > >> > Phoenix, Cassandra, Optiq > >> > > >> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > >> > aware of? > >> > > >> > None > >> > > >> > How has the community developed since the last report? > >> > > >> > A few new people have started to work actively on the mailing list. > It > >> is > >> > still a small > >> > community, and growth is needed. On the positive side we do see > certain > >> > new individuals > >> > starting to contribute continuously to the project. > >> > > >> > We have been working on blogging, tweeting etc. to create more > >> out-going > >> > communication > >> > about MetaModel. We feel that more of such activity is needed. > >> > > >> > How has the project developed since the last report? > >> > > >> > Apache MetaModel 4.1.0-RC1-incubating was released on Jan 21. This > time > >> > with a new > >> > release engineer, which meant that the release instructions were > >> > re-iterated and updated. > >> > > >> > Communication on mailing list is improving and we see more > diversity of > >> > requests. > >> > For instance, connectivity to Hadoop and HBase was previously not > very > >> > active > >> > but now it's is taking a good share of the focus. > >> > > >> > Date of last release: > >> > > >> > May 12th > >> > > >> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > >> > > >> > June 2013 (but a new committer is being invited just now) > >> > > >> > > >> > 2014-06-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> >> Any volunteer to write up report for July? > >> >> > >> >> - Henry > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Marvin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Dear podling, > >> >> > > >> >> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > >> >> Incubator PMC. > >> >> > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare > your > >> >> quarterly > >> >> > board report. > >> >> > > >> >> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2014, 10:30:30:00 > PST. > >> >> The report > >> >> > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The > >> >> Incubator PMC > >> >> > requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board > meeting, > >> >> to allow > >> >> > sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Jul 2nd). > >> >> > > >> >> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the > incubator > >> >> PMC, and > >> >> > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very > >> latest > >> >> you > >> >> > should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > > >> >> > The Apache Incubator PMC > >> >> > > >> >> > Submitting your Report > >> >> > ---------------------- > >> >> > > >> >> > Your report should contain the following: > >> >> > > >> >> > * Your project name > >> >> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge > of > >> >> the project > >> >> > or necessarily of its field > >> >> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move > >> >> towards > >> >> > graduation. > >> >> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need > to > >> be > >> >> aware of > >> >> > * How has the community developed since the last report > >> >> > * How has the project developed since the last report. > >> >> > > >> >> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: > >> >> > > >> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2014 > >> >> > > >> >> > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before > >> this > >> >> page is > >> >> > created from a template. > >> >> > > >> >> > Mentors > >> >> > ------- > >> >> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them > off > >> on > >> >> the > >> >> > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following > >> the > >> >> > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the > >> >> Incubator PMC. > >> >> > > >> >> > Incubator PMC > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >
