Hi Kasper, I will update the report today.
- Henry On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]> wrote: > Mentors or committers, can anyone of you please take the last report from > this thread and post on the wiki? (Unless you have remarks of course) > Den 01/07/2014 02.26 skrev "Kasper Sørensen" <[email protected] >>: > >> I am travelling around for the next couple of days, so if anyone can take >> this further from here, please do! >> >> >> 2014-06-30 11:19 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected] >> >: >> >>> Here's the updated version then: >>> >>> ---- >>> >>> MetaModel >>> >>> MetaModel is a data access framework, providing a common interface for >>> exploration and querying of different types of datastores. >>> >>> MetaModel has been incubating since 2013-06-12. >>> >>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >>> >>> 1. More contributors to increase diversity of the community >>> 2. Finalize 4.2.0 release to demonstrate new functionality and >>> understanding of ASF policies >>> 3. Connect with other projects from Apache's ecosystem such as HBase, >>> Phoenix, Cassandra, Optiq >>> >>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >>> aware of? >>> >>> None >>> >>> How has the community developed since the last report? >>> >>> A few new people have started to work actively on the mailing list. It >>> is still a small >>> community, and growth is needed. On the positive side we do see certain >>> new individuals >>> starting to contribute continuously to the project. >>> >>> We have been working on blogging, tweeting etc. to create more >>> out-going communication >>> about MetaModel. We feel that more of such activity is needed. >>> >>> How has the project developed since the last report? >>> >>> Apache MetaModel 4.1.0-incubating was released on Jan 21. This time >>> with a new >>> release engineer, which meant that the release instructions were >>> re-iterated and updated. >>> >>> Communication on mailing list is improving and we see more diversity of >>> requests. >>> For instance, connectivity to Hadoop and HBase was previously not very >>> active >>> but now it's is taking a good share of the focus. >>> >>> Subscribers on @dev mailing list: 48 >>> >>> Date of last release: >>> >>> May 12th >>> >>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >>> >>> June 2013 (but a new committer is being invited just now) >>> >>> >>> 2014-06-30 11:08 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>> OK that makes sense I guess. I would then suggest we go for 4.2.0 next >>>> time, since it's again adding a lot of stuff (and especially the part about >>>> making ColumnType an interface instead of an enum is a big change from >>>> compatibility POV). I'll update the CHANGES.txt file because that is >>>> currently a mess on master branch then :-P >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-06-30 9:45 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Unfortunately that was not the way release in interpreted in ASF, the >>>>> RC is a release candidate number for 4.1.0. >>>>> So technically we have released 4.1.0 which delivered with RC1. >>>>> >>>>> I missed the subject of the email you sent out for the last MetaModel >>>>> release VOTE, which included the RC postfix. >>>>> Mea culpa from me, I assume you know that RC tags are just used to >>>>> discriminate different attempts to get particular release. >>>>> >>>>> We could do next 4.1.1 or 4.2.0. >>>>> >>>>> - Henry >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Kasper Sørensen >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Well in my opinion we only released "RC1", so one milestone on the way >>>>> > towards 4.1 ... But maybe that part needs more sharing of ideas etc. I >>>>> > would also be fine calling the next release 4.2 and then just skip the >>>>> > RC-suffix. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > 2014-06-30 6:49 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: >>>>> > >>>>> >> HI Kasper, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks for taking stab at the report. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I believe 4.1.0 is out so I recommend change the status to "Apache >>>>> >> MetaModel 4.1.0-incubating was released on Jan 21. This time ..." >>>>> >> >>>>> >> For the "Three most important issues to address in the move towards >>>>> >> graduation" section, why no 2 is about finalize 4.1 release? >>>>> >> The 4.1.0 release is out already so we just need to mention about >>>>> >> having more releases to demonstrate understanding of ASF policies? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - Henry >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Kasper Sørensen >>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> > How about something like this... >>>>> >> > - Kasper >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > ---- >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > MetaModel >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > MetaModel is a data access framework, providing a common interface >>>>> for >>>>> >> > exploration and querying of different types of datastores. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > MetaModel has been incubating since 2013-06-12. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards >>>>> graduation: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > 1. More contributors to increase diversity of the community >>>>> >> > 2. Finalize 4.1 release to demonstrate new functionality and >>>>> evolution >>>>> >> > within Apache >>>>> >> > 3. Connect with other projects from Apache's ecosystem such as >>>>> HBase, >>>>> >> > Phoenix, Cassandra, Optiq >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to >>>>> be >>>>> >> > aware of? >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > None >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > How has the community developed since the last report? >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > A few new people have started to work actively on the mailing >>>>> list. It >>>>> >> is >>>>> >> > still a small >>>>> >> > community, and growth is needed. On the positive side we do see >>>>> certain >>>>> >> > new individuals >>>>> >> > starting to contribute continuously to the project. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > We have been working on blogging, tweeting etc. to create more >>>>> >> out-going >>>>> >> > communication >>>>> >> > about MetaModel. We feel that more of such activity is needed. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > How has the project developed since the last report? >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Apache MetaModel 4.1.0-RC1-incubating was released on Jan 21. >>>>> This time >>>>> >> > with a new >>>>> >> > release engineer, which meant that the release instructions were >>>>> >> > re-iterated and updated. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Communication on mailing list is improving and we see more >>>>> diversity of >>>>> >> > requests. >>>>> >> > For instance, connectivity to Hadoop and HBase was previously >>>>> not very >>>>> >> > active >>>>> >> > but now it's is taking a good share of the focus. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Date of last release: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > May 12th >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > June 2013 (but a new committer is being invited just now) >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > 2014-06-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected] >>>>> >: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >> Any volunteer to write up report for July? >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> - Henry >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Marvin <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Dear podling, >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the >>>>> Apache >>>>> >> >> Incubator PMC. >>>>> >> >> > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare >>>>> your >>>>> >> >> quarterly >>>>> >> >> > board report. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2014, >>>>> 10:30:30:00 PST. >>>>> >> >> The report >>>>> >> >> > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. >>>>> The >>>>> >> >> Incubator PMC >>>>> >> >> > requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board >>>>> meeting, >>>>> >> >> to allow >>>>> >> >> > sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Jul 2nd). >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the >>>>> incubator >>>>> >> >> PMC, and >>>>> >> >> > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very >>>>> >> latest >>>>> >> >> you >>>>> >> >> > should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > The Apache Incubator PMC >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Submitting your Report >>>>> >> >> > ---------------------- >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Your report should contain the following: >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > * Your project name >>>>> >> >> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no >>>>> knowledge of >>>>> >> >> the project >>>>> >> >> > or necessarily of its field >>>>> >> >> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the >>>>> move >>>>> >> >> towards >>>>> >> >> > graduation. >>>>> >> >> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might >>>>> wish/need to >>>>> >> be >>>>> >> >> aware of >>>>> >> >> > * How has the community developed since the last report >>>>> >> >> > * How has the project developed since the last report. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2014 >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little >>>>> before >>>>> >> this >>>>> >> >> page is >>>>> >> >> > created from a template. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Mentors >>>>> >> >> > ------- >>>>> >> >> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign >>>>> them off >>>>> >> on >>>>> >> >> the >>>>> >> >> > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are >>>>> following >>>>> >> the >>>>> >> >> > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the >>>>> >> >> Incubator PMC. >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > Incubator PMC >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
