Mentors or committers, can anyone of you please take the last report from this thread and post on the wiki? (Unless you have remarks of course) Den 01/07/2014 02.26 skrev "Kasper Sørensen" <[email protected] >:
> I am travelling around for the next couple of days, so if anyone can take > this further from here, please do! > > > 2014-06-30 11:19 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected] > >: > >> Here's the updated version then: >> >> ---- >> >> MetaModel >> >> MetaModel is a data access framework, providing a common interface for >> exploration and querying of different types of datastores. >> >> MetaModel has been incubating since 2013-06-12. >> >> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >> >> 1. More contributors to increase diversity of the community >> 2. Finalize 4.2.0 release to demonstrate new functionality and >> understanding of ASF policies >> 3. Connect with other projects from Apache's ecosystem such as HBase, >> Phoenix, Cassandra, Optiq >> >> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >> aware of? >> >> None >> >> How has the community developed since the last report? >> >> A few new people have started to work actively on the mailing list. It >> is still a small >> community, and growth is needed. On the positive side we do see certain >> new individuals >> starting to contribute continuously to the project. >> >> We have been working on blogging, tweeting etc. to create more >> out-going communication >> about MetaModel. We feel that more of such activity is needed. >> >> How has the project developed since the last report? >> >> Apache MetaModel 4.1.0-incubating was released on Jan 21. This time >> with a new >> release engineer, which meant that the release instructions were >> re-iterated and updated. >> >> Communication on mailing list is improving and we see more diversity of >> requests. >> For instance, connectivity to Hadoop and HBase was previously not very >> active >> but now it's is taking a good share of the focus. >> >> Subscribers on @dev mailing list: 48 >> >> Date of last release: >> >> May 12th >> >> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >> >> June 2013 (but a new committer is being invited just now) >> >> >> 2014-06-30 11:08 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen < >> [email protected]>: >> >> OK that makes sense I guess. I would then suggest we go for 4.2.0 next >>> time, since it's again adding a lot of stuff (and especially the part about >>> making ColumnType an interface instead of an enum is a big change from >>> compatibility POV). I'll update the CHANGES.txt file because that is >>> currently a mess on master branch then :-P >>> >>> >>> 2014-06-30 9:45 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Unfortunately that was not the way release in interpreted in ASF, the >>>> RC is a release candidate number for 4.1.0. >>>> So technically we have released 4.1.0 which delivered with RC1. >>>> >>>> I missed the subject of the email you sent out for the last MetaModel >>>> release VOTE, which included the RC postfix. >>>> Mea culpa from me, I assume you know that RC tags are just used to >>>> discriminate different attempts to get particular release. >>>> >>>> We could do next 4.1.1 or 4.2.0. >>>> >>>> - Henry >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Kasper Sørensen >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Well in my opinion we only released "RC1", so one milestone on the way >>>> > towards 4.1 ... But maybe that part needs more sharing of ideas etc. I >>>> > would also be fine calling the next release 4.2 and then just skip the >>>> > RC-suffix. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > 2014-06-30 6:49 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: >>>> > >>>> >> HI Kasper, >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks for taking stab at the report. >>>> >> >>>> >> I believe 4.1.0 is out so I recommend change the status to "Apache >>>> >> MetaModel 4.1.0-incubating was released on Jan 21. This time ..." >>>> >> >>>> >> For the "Three most important issues to address in the move towards >>>> >> graduation" section, why no 2 is about finalize 4.1 release? >>>> >> The 4.1.0 release is out already so we just need to mention about >>>> >> having more releases to demonstrate understanding of ASF policies? >>>> >> >>>> >> - Henry >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Kasper Sørensen >>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > How about something like this... >>>> >> > - Kasper >>>> >> > >>>> >> > ---- >>>> >> > >>>> >> > MetaModel >>>> >> > >>>> >> > MetaModel is a data access framework, providing a common interface >>>> for >>>> >> > exploration and querying of different types of datastores. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > MetaModel has been incubating since 2013-06-12. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards >>>> graduation: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > 1. More contributors to increase diversity of the community >>>> >> > 2. Finalize 4.1 release to demonstrate new functionality and >>>> evolution >>>> >> > within Apache >>>> >> > 3. Connect with other projects from Apache's ecosystem such as >>>> HBase, >>>> >> > Phoenix, Cassandra, Optiq >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to >>>> be >>>> >> > aware of? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > None >>>> >> > >>>> >> > How has the community developed since the last report? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > A few new people have started to work actively on the mailing >>>> list. It >>>> >> is >>>> >> > still a small >>>> >> > community, and growth is needed. On the positive side we do see >>>> certain >>>> >> > new individuals >>>> >> > starting to contribute continuously to the project. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > We have been working on blogging, tweeting etc. to create more >>>> >> out-going >>>> >> > communication >>>> >> > about MetaModel. We feel that more of such activity is needed. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > How has the project developed since the last report? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Apache MetaModel 4.1.0-RC1-incubating was released on Jan 21. >>>> This time >>>> >> > with a new >>>> >> > release engineer, which meant that the release instructions were >>>> >> > re-iterated and updated. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Communication on mailing list is improving and we see more >>>> diversity of >>>> >> > requests. >>>> >> > For instance, connectivity to Hadoop and HBase was previously >>>> not very >>>> >> > active >>>> >> > but now it's is taking a good share of the focus. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Date of last release: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > May 12th >>>> >> > >>>> >> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > June 2013 (but a new committer is being invited just now) >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > 2014-06-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected] >>>> >: >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> Any volunteer to write up report for July? >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> - Henry >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Marvin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Dear podling, >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the >>>> Apache >>>> >> >> Incubator PMC. >>>> >> >> > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare >>>> your >>>> >> >> quarterly >>>> >> >> > board report. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 July 2014, >>>> 10:30:30:00 PST. >>>> >> >> The report >>>> >> >> > for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. >>>> The >>>> >> >> Incubator PMC >>>> >> >> > requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board >>>> meeting, >>>> >> >> to allow >>>> >> >> > sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Jul 2nd). >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the >>>> incubator >>>> >> >> PMC, and >>>> >> >> > subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very >>>> >> latest >>>> >> >> you >>>> >> >> > should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Thanks, >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > The Apache Incubator PMC >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Submitting your Report >>>> >> >> > ---------------------- >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Your report should contain the following: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > * Your project name >>>> >> >> > * A brief description of your project, which assumes no >>>> knowledge of >>>> >> >> the project >>>> >> >> > or necessarily of its field >>>> >> >> > * A list of the three most important issues to address in the >>>> move >>>> >> >> towards >>>> >> >> > graduation. >>>> >> >> > * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might >>>> wish/need to >>>> >> be >>>> >> >> aware of >>>> >> >> > * How has the community developed since the last report >>>> >> >> > * How has the project developed since the last report. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2014 >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little >>>> before >>>> >> this >>>> >> >> page is >>>> >> >> > created from a template. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Mentors >>>> >> >> > ------- >>>> >> >> > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign >>>> them off >>>> >> on >>>> >> >> the >>>> >> >> > Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are >>>> following >>>> >> the >>>> >> >> > project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the >>>> >> >> Incubator PMC. >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Incubator PMC >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
