Hello Go, i was reading your LinuxCon Milagro Slides (interesting). React native target java code in Android.. So i am going to explore how to integrate with your java at client side. I think the project is interesting to me expecially the server side. Best Regards, Giorgio.
2018-03-29 9:31 GMT+02:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]>: > Milagro MFA is designed without depending on specific frameworks, and it > should work with react, too. > > If you mean native is a custom authentication module, the answer is no. > However, it should work with react using an LDAP authentication module and > I hope this would answer your question. > > The code we have been trying to commit includes an LDAP wrapper that > replaces the standard password authentication with Milagoro MFA. As we > demonstrated at ApachCon, Milagro MFA works with Django, WordPress, Drupal, > and many other applications. > > Regards, > Go Yamamoto > > -----Original Message----- > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 4:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > Can be used milagro with react native? I mean the autentication. > > > 2018-03-12 10:13 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]>: > > > Thank you for guidance. Sorry, I was somewhat confused. > > > > "We" means NTT in this context. > > > > I understand Milagro project has some difficulty in releasing code at > > the official repository. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-milagro > > > > The reason is not clear for me, however, if a new official repository > > resolves the issue, then I think it is a good idea to install it. > > > > For that purpose NTT is willing to work in managements. > > > > Regards, > > Go Yamamoto > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 10:34 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > > > On 2018/03/08 05:20:41, "Go Yamamoto" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Who is taking care of management tasks right now? > > > We would like to request the official repository to release our code. > > > If nobody is working for the task, we will take it over. > > > > Who is "we" in this case? > > http://git.apache.org/ shows 11 repositories for Milagro. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Go Yamamoto > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nikolai Stoilov [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:51 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > Hi Go, > > > > > > Regarding management, I can show someone from your side how to fill > > > in > > the > > monthly reports which are required for the project. > > > > > > Nikolai > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:24 PM Giorgio Zoppi > > > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, > > > > just to be proactive, schedule some tickets when you have a plan > > > > and i will able to do a couple of jiras at week, > > > > > > > > 2018-02-19 17:15 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Giorgio. > > > > > > > > > > All, let's start planning release the crypto library first. > > > > > I think we can simply start official repository that mirrors > > > > > current crypto code at Miracl's, and then we declare that it is > > > > > the master of the project. > > > > > After that, Miracl's team will pull-request to contribute the > > > > advancements > > > > > at the local repo. > > > > > > > > > > We can start right now. > > > > > Who is managing the official repo right now? > > > > > > > > > > Go > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:00 AM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > > > > > If it goes as planner i canhelp and build and test code. Porting > > > > > some > > > > code > > > > > to c++ for the server part. > > > > > > > > > > 2018-02-19 16:53 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > > > > We again request to discuss renewing the roadmap and to start > > > > > > the official repository to share the codes we have worked for > > years. > > > > > > Kelean, what do you think is blocking this obvious task? > > > > > > > > > > > > If this project needs help in management, we are willing to > > > > participate. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Go Yamamto > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Go Yamamoto [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 1:24 PM > > > > > > To: '[email protected]' > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > > > > > > > Simeon, please tell us whatever you need. > > > > > > I think it is obvious that the leadership team is responsible > > > > > > to present a roadmap. > > > > > > I will be always willing to participate or to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > Go > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 8:01 PM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > > > > > > > If there is a clear roadmap. You can decide to assign some > > > > > > tickets to me and i will help. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-02-07 10:13 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem > > <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for being out of pocket for a while and not being able > > > > > > > to participate in the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re the repositories reorganization - it hasn't been really > > > > > > > clear how this needs to be done from a procedural stand point. > > > > > > > None of the contributors have the permissions to manipulate > > > > > > > the project repositories, and AFAIK, only the project > > > > > > > mentors can do that, but what needs to be done in order for > > > > > > > this to happen, hasn't > > > > > been clear. > > > > > > > This was one of our pain points along the way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re the roadmap - as I already mentioned, MIRACL didn't have > > > > > > > resources to lead the project, but the question is - in a > > > > > > > community like this, who is responsible to craft a roadmap? > > > > > > > The discussed direction is to focus the project on the > > > > > > > crypto library, with which MIRACL and NTT agree, and I guess > > > > > > > if/when NTT take the leading role on the project, they can > > > > > > > propose a > > roadmap. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We also have a more developed version of the crypto, with > > > > > > > full unit-test coverage, which we can merge to the project > > > > > > > when we figure-out the repositories issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > > Simeon Aladjem > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/18, 6:49, "Go Yamamoto" > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have been talking with Simeon and Kealan about the > > roadmap. > > > > > > > We think it will make sense if we release the crypto > > > > > > > library first, and then the authentication server/clients > > > > > > > second. What do we need to authorize the plan? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far the code in the library looks mature and we have > > > > > > > found no problems in actual use in our engineering activities. > > > > > > > It could be better to work for test codes more before > > > > > > > the crypto library released since the current code does not > > > > > > > seem to cover sub-normal cases necessarily. > > > > > > > It does not mean I think the improvements on test codes > > > > > > > are required for the first release, they will at least help > > > > > > > further development activities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, our repository contains a lot of possible > > > > > > > contributions on test codes. > > > > > > > I believe the code will help users and developers if > > > > > > > they are > > > > > merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Go Yamamoto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:29 AM > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, > > > > > > > do you have a roadmap? Do you want to support hardware > > > > > > > as > > well? > > > > > > > IS there a todo list of things? When do you plan next release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-01-30 22:26 GMT+01:00 Giorgio Zoppi < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > > > is there any way to save just the crypto library > > > > > > > inside > > Apache? > > > > > The > > > > > > > > server doenst make sense, there is no valuable code. > > > > > > > > The crypto library including mpin protocol can be used > > > > > > > from > > > > other > > > > > > > > projects. Currently there is no community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-01-30 22:12 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Simeon, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> In order for that to happen, someone would need to > > > > > > > make sure > > > > Go > > > > > > > >> Yamamoto has write access to the repositories. I'm > > > > > > > not sure that has happened. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> John > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 2018/01/30 14:49:07, Simeon Aladjem > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > Hi all, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > As a part of MIRACL, I feel that I have to provide > > > > > > > our > > > > > > perspective > > > > > > > >> > on > > > > > > > >> the project. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > First of all, we did disengage with the idea to > > > > > > > move the > > > > > Milagro > > > > > > > >> > Crypto > > > > > > > >> code elsewhere. > > > > > > > >> > All the code under the Milagro project refers to > > > > > > > the > > crypto > > > > > > > >> > repository > > > > > > > >> that is under Apache, so > > > > > > > https://github.com/milagro-crypto > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > >> directly affect the project at the current. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > It does contain a more developed version of the > > > > > > > original > > > > > Milagro > > > > > > > >> > Crypto > > > > > > > >> code, which will eventually find its way to the project, > > > > > > > >> > but in order for this to happen we will need some > > repository > > > > > > > >> reorganization, which was communicated in the past, > > > > > > > to the best of my > > > > > > > >> memory. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > MIRACL is committed to continue and contribute to > > > > > > > the > > > > Milagro > > > > > > > >> > Crypto > > > > > > > >> code, but we were unable to play the leading role in > > > > > > > the project > > > > > > for > > > > > > > >> the last year or so. > > > > > > > >> > For this reason, it was proposed that NTT and Go > > > > > > > Yamamoto will take > > > > > > > >> > on > > > > > > > >> the leadership over the project going forward. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I hope that it clarifies some points, and will help > > > > > > > on getting > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> project out of the mud and to start moving it forward. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Kind Regards, > > > > > > > >> > Simeon Aladjem > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > On 30/1/18, 15:54, "John D.Ament" > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Yamamoto > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I believe you're hitting the problem right on the > > head. > > > > > The > > > > > > > >> project was originally founded with a donation from > > MIRACL. > > > > > > > You > > > > > > can > > > > > > > >> see that code changes continually go to > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/milagro-crypto but no changes to > > > > > > > Apache hosted git repositories. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I understand your frustration, but the > implications > > I > > am > > > > > > > seeing > > > > > > > >> > are > > > > > > > >> that MIRACL has no interest in working on code within > > > > > > > the > > > > > podling. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > John > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > On 2018/01/30 05:17:42, "Go Yamamoto" > > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > Hi John, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > NTT is currently using Milagro as a crypto > > library. > > > > > > > >> > Retirement > > > > > > > >> of Milagro causes impact on our business, so I would > > > > > > > like to ask > > > > > > for > > > > > > > >> discussion what can we do for supporting Milagro. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > As I mentioned last time, we have code that is > > ready > > > > to > > > > > > > commit. > > > > > > > >> > > Our repositories have been updated since then. > > > > > > > >> > > However, the way to commit the code to Apache > > > > repository > > > > > > is > > > > > > > >> > not > > > > > > > >> clear for us. > > > > > > > >> > > As far as I recognize it is because the code > from > > > > MIRACL > > > > > > is > > > > > > > >> > not > > > > > > > >> placed on the Apache repository. > > > > > > > >> > > Since MIRACL's code also have been updated > > > > continuously, > > > > > > it > > > > > > > >> > seems > > > > > > > >> this management problem blocks starting the project > > > > > > > for > > years. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > I think we can discuss whether NTT team can take > > over > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> management of the Apache repository to resolve the > > problem. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > >> > > Go Yamamoto > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > >> > > From: John D. Ament [mailto: > [email protected] > > ] > > > > > > > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:06 PM > > > > > > > >> > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > >> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hi All, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Mid last year [1] I reached out to the project > > about > > > > > > > retirement. > > > > > > > >> At that point, some community members stepped up to > > > > > > > help out the project. > > > > > > > >> However, I don't believe its been enough. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Since that has occurred: > > > > > > > >> > > - Milagro has missed reporting periods. This > has > > > > > included > > > > > > > >> multiple requests for a report by me. > > > > > > > >> > > - Requests for a special report clarifying the > > move > > of > > > > > > > source > > > > > > > >> code away from the ASF managed repos on github have > > > > > > > been > > > > > > unanswered. > > > > > > > >> > > - On list activity has dropped to nearly > nothing. > > > > > > > >> > > - Very little commit activity; most of your > > > > repositories > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > >> > not > > > > > > > >> been updated since we last spoke. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > At this point, I believe its clear that Milagro > > should > > > > > > > retire. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > [1]: > > > > > > > >> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > > > > > > e6a5db6fab6c61156c2101a > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ae003ed576ddb0e77f3bb2c037b405131@%3Cdev.milagro.apache.org > > > > %3E > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Nikolai Stoilov > > > NOC/Support Team Lead > > > MIRACL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
