Ok,
it is a mess to have spread repositories in two sites. I will expect to
have directly in the Apache ASF. I don't know which is the direct
repository.  For now i have been able to build the lib on ubuntu with
github no apache repo I am bit confused about 11 repos at Apache, which
code is not updated since 2 years..What is the block (to remove) to move
your current repository to apache? And when will be the first release of at
least the library? Can I help in planning and merging the repositories?  If
we dont release often, we cannot spread the voice, integrate iwth other
apache products and the community will not grow.
Best Regards,
Giorgio.

2018-03-29 9:31 GMT+02:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]>:

> Milagro MFA is designed without depending on specific frameworks, and it
> should work with react, too.
>
> If you mean native is a custom authentication module, the answer is no.
> However, it should work with react using an LDAP authentication module and
> I hope this would answer your question.
>
> The code we have been trying to commit includes an LDAP wrapper that
> replaces the standard password authentication with Milagoro MFA.  As we
> demonstrated at ApachCon, Milagro MFA works with Django, WordPress, Drupal,
> and many other applications.
>
> Regards,
> Go Yamamoto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 4:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
>
> Can be used milagro with react native? I mean the autentication.
>
>
> 2018-03-12 10:13 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]>:
>
> > Thank you for guidance.  Sorry, I was somewhat confused.
> >
> > "We" means NTT in this context.
> >
> > I understand Milagro project has some difficulty in releasing code at
> > the official repository.
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-milagro
> >
> > The reason is not clear for me, however, if a new official repository
> > resolves the issue, then I think it is a good idea to install it.
> >
> > For that purpose NTT is willing to work in managements.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Go Yamamoto
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 10:34 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2018/03/08 05:20:41, "Go Yamamoto" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Who is taking care of management tasks right now?
> > > We would like to request the official repository to release our code.
> > > If nobody is working for the task, we will take it over.
> >
> > Who is "we" in this case?
> > http://git.apache.org/ shows 11 repositories for Milagro.
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Go Yamamoto
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nikolai Stoilov [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:51 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > >
> > > Hi Go,
> > >
> > > Regarding management, I can show someone from your side how to fill
> > > in
> > the
> > monthly reports which are required for the project.
> > >
> > > Nikolai
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:24 PM Giorgio Zoppi
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok,
> > > > just to be proactive, schedule some tickets when you have a plan
> > > > and i will able to do a couple of jiras at week,
> > > >
> > > > 2018-02-19 17:15 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Giorgio.
> > > > >
> > > > > All, let's start planning release the crypto library first.
> > > > > I think we can simply start official repository that mirrors
> > > > > current crypto code at Miracl's, and then we declare that it is
> > > > > the master of the project.
> > > > > After that, Miracl's team will pull-request to contribute the
> > > > advancements
> > > > > at the local repo.
> > > > >
> > > > > We can start right now.
> > > > > Who is managing the official repo right now?
> > > > >
> > > > > Go
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 1:00 AM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > >
> > > > > If it goes as planner i canhelp and build and test code. Porting
> > > > > some
> > > > code
> > > > > to c++ for the server part.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-02-19 16:53 GMT+01:00 Go Yamamoto <[email protected]
> >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We again request to discuss renewing the roadmap and to start
> > > > > > the official repository to share the codes we have worked for
> > years.
> > > > > > Kelean, what do you think is blocking this obvious task?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If this project needs help in management, we are willing to
> > > > participate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Go Yamamto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Go Yamamoto [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 1:24 PM
> > > > > > To: '[email protected]'
> > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Simeon, please tell us whatever you need.
> > > > > > I think it is obvious that the leadership team is responsible
> > > > > > to present a roadmap.
> > > > > > I will be always willing to participate or to help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Go
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 8:01 PM
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If there is a clear roadmap. You can decide to assign some
> > > > > > tickets to me and i will help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-02-07 10:13 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem
> > <[email protected]>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry for being out of pocket for a while and not being able
> > > > > > > to participate in the discussion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Re the repositories reorganization - it hasn't been really
> > > > > > > clear how this needs to be done from a procedural stand point.
> > > > > > > None of the contributors have the permissions to manipulate
> > > > > > > the project repositories, and AFAIK, only the project
> > > > > > > mentors can do that, but what needs to be done in order for
> > > > > > > this to happen, hasn't
> > > > > been clear.
> > > > > > > This was one of our pain points along the way.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Re the roadmap - as I already mentioned, MIRACL didn't have
> > > > > > > resources to lead the project, but the question is - in a
> > > > > > > community like this, who is responsible to craft a roadmap?
> > > > > > > The discussed direction is to focus the project on the
> > > > > > > crypto library, with which MIRACL and NTT agree, and I guess
> > > > > > > if/when NTT take the leading role on the project, they can
> > > > > > > propose a
> > roadmap.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We also have a more developed version of the crypto, with
> > > > > > > full unit-test coverage, which we can merge to the project
> > > > > > > when we figure-out the repositories issue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > > > Simeon Aladjem
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/2/18, 6:49, "Go Yamamoto"
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     We have been talking with Simeon and Kealan about the
> > roadmap.
> > > > > > >     We think it will make sense if we release the crypto
> > > > > > > library first, and then the authentication server/clients
> > > > > > > second.  What do we need to authorize the plan?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     So far the code in the library looks mature and we have
> > > > > > > found no problems in actual use in our engineering activities.
> > > > > > >     It could be better to work for test codes more before
> > > > > > > the crypto library released since the current code does not
> > > > > > > seem to cover sub-normal cases necessarily.
> > > > > > >     It does not mean I think the improvements on test codes
> > > > > > > are required for the first release, they will at least help
> > > > > > > further development activities.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     BTW, our repository contains a lot of possible
> > > > > > > contributions on test codes.
> > > > > > >     I believe the code will help users and developers if
> > > > > > > they are
> > > > > merged.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     Regards,
> > > > > > >     Go Yamamoto
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >     From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > >     Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:29 AM
> > > > > > >     To: [email protected]
> > > > > > >     Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     BTW,
> > > > > > >     do you have a roadmap? Do you want to support hardware
> > > > > > > as
> > well?
> > > > > > > IS there  a todo list of things? When do you plan next release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     2018-01-30 22:26 GMT+01:00 Giorgio Zoppi <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     > Hello everybody,
> > > > > > >     > is there any way to save just the crypto library
> > > > > > > inside
> > Apache?
> > > > > The
> > > > > > >     > server  doenst make sense, there is no valuable code.
> > > > > > >     > The crypto library including mpin protocol can be used
> > > > > > > from
> > > > other
> > > > > > >     > projects. Currently there is no community.
> > > > > > >     >
> > > > > > >     >
> > > > > > >     > 2018-01-30 22:12 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >     >
> > > > > > >     >> Simeon,
> > > > > > >     >>
> > > > > > >     >> In order for that to happen, someone would need to
> > > > > > > make sure
> > > > Go
> > > > > > >     >> Yamamoto has write access to the repositories.  I'm
> > > > > > > not sure that has happened.
> > > > > > >     >>
> > > > > > >     >> John
> > > > > > >     >>
> > > > > > >     >> On 2018/01/30 14:49:07, Simeon Aladjem
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >     >> > Hi all,
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > As a part of MIRACL, I feel that I have to provide
> > > > > > > our
> > > > > > perspective
> > > > > > >     >> > on
> > > > > > >     >> the project.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > First of all, we did disengage with the idea to
> > > > > > > move the
> > > > > Milagro
> > > > > > >     >> > Crypto
> > > > > > >     >> code elsewhere.
> > > > > > >     >> > All the code under the Milagro project refers to
> > > > > > > the
> > crypto
> > > > > > >     >> > repository
> > > > > > >     >> that is under Apache, so
> > > > > > > https://github.com/milagro-crypto
> > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > >     >> directly affect the project at the current.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > It does contain a more developed version of the
> > > > > > > original
> > > > > Milagro
> > > > > > >     >> > Crypto
> > > > > > >     >> code, which will eventually find its way to the project,
> > > > > > >     >> > but in order for this to happen we will need some
> > repository
> > > > > > >     >> reorganization, which was communicated in the past,
> > > > > > > to the best of my
> > > > > > >     >> memory.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > MIRACL is committed to continue and contribute to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > Milagro
> > > > > > >     >> > Crypto
> > > > > > >     >> code, but we were unable to play the leading role in
> > > > > > > the project
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > >     >> the last year or so.
> > > > > > >     >> > For this reason, it was proposed that NTT and Go
> > > > > > > Yamamoto will take
> > > > > > >     >> > on
> > > > > > >     >> the leadership over the project going forward.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > I hope that it clarifies some points, and will help
> > > > > > > on getting
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >     >> project out of the mud and to start moving it forward.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > Kind Regards,
> > > > > > >     >> > Simeon Aladjem
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> > On 30/1/18, 15:54, "John D.Ament"
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> >     Hi Yamamoto
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> >     I believe you're hitting the problem right on the
> > head.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > >     >> project was originally founded with a donation from
> > MIRACL.
> > > > > > > You
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > >     >> see that code changes continually go to
> > > > > > >     >> https://github.com/milagro-crypto but no changes to
> > > > > > > Apache hosted git repositories.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> >     I understand your frustration, but the
> implications
> > I
> > am
> > > > > > > seeing
> > > > > > >     >> > are
> > > > > > >     >> that MIRACL has no interest in working on code within
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > podling.
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> >     John
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> >     On 2018/01/30 05:17:42, "Go Yamamoto"
> > > > > > >     >> > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > >     >> wrote:
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Hi John,
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > NTT is currently using Milagro as a crypto
> > library.
> > > > > > >     >> > Retirement
> > > > > > >     >> of Milagro causes impact on our business, so I would
> > > > > > > like to ask
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > >     >> discussion what can we do for supporting Milagro.
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > As I mentioned last time, we have code that is
> > ready
> > > > to
> > > > > > > commit.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Our repositories have been updated since then.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > However, the way to commit the code to Apache
> > > > repository
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >     >> > not
> > > > > > >     >> clear for us.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > As far as I recognize it is because the code
> from
> > > > MIRACL
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >     >> > not
> > > > > > >     >> placed on the Apache repository.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Since MIRACL's code also have been updated
> > > > continuously,
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > >     >> > seems
> > > > > > >     >> this management problem blocks starting the project
> > > > > > > for
> > years.
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > I think we can discuss whether NTT team can take
> > over
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >     >> management of the Apache repository to resolve the
> > problem.
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Kind regards,
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Go Yamamoto
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >     >> >     > From: John D. Ament [mailto:
> [email protected]
> > ]
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 1:06 PM
> > > > > > >     >> >     > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Milagro
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Hi All,
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Mid last year [1] I reached out to the project
> > about
> > > > > > > retirement.
> > > > > > >     >> At that point, some community members stepped up to
> > > > > > > help out the project.
> > > > > > >     >> However, I don't believe its been enough.
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > Since that has occurred:
> > > > > > >     >> >     > - Milagro has missed reporting periods.  This
> has
> > > > > included
> > > > > > >     >> multiple requests for a report by me.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > - Requests for a special report clarifying the
> > move
> > of
> > > > > > > source
> > > > > > >     >> code away from the ASF managed repos on github have
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > unanswered.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > - On list activity has dropped to nearly
> nothing.
> > > > > > >     >> >     > - Very little commit activity; most of your
> > > > repositories
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > >     >> > not
> > > > > > >     >> been updated since we last spoke.
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > At this point, I believe its clear that Milagro
> > should
> > > > > > > retire.
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     > [1]:
> > > > > > >     >> >     > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> > > > > > > e6a5db6fab6c61156c2101a
> > > > > > >     >>
> > > > > > > ae003ed576ddb0e77f3bb2c037b405131@%3Cdev.milagro.apache.org
> > > > %3E
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >     >
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >> >
> > > > > > >     >>
> > > > > > >     >
> > > > > > >     >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Nikolai Stoilov
> > > NOC/Support Team Lead
> > > MIRACL
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to