Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 11:45 -0400, Adam Fisk a écrit : > The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly > blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views > on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector > threading and ByteBuffer use. > > http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-2992&yr=2007&track=5 > > Maybe someone could comment on the performance improvements in MINA 2.0? It > might also be useful to look at Grizzlies techniques to see if MINA could > incorporate them. I know at least Scott Oaks from Grizzly is a solid > performance guy, so their numbers are likely correct. > > Quick note: I'm not trying to spark a Grizzly/MINA battle by any means. I > just started using MINA after having implemented several generic NIO > frameworks myself, and I absolutely love MINA's approach. It allowed me to > code a STUN server in 2 days, and I'm porting my SIP server now. > > Thanks, > > Adam
Do you think they mind publishing the tested code, so we can take a look ? I sound very funny, specialy comparing to 'C based server' without more details. Julien
