On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote: > The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant > performance improvement. It seems like they used older release (or didn't > use a lightweight asyncweb example). Moreover, I don't think MINA doesn't > have any noticeably big margin for improvement in performance, at least > from the following performance test report. > > http://mina.apache.org/performance-test-reports.html
That's a fantastic report! However it would be fair to the poor old Apache if you enabled mod_cache and used a newer version (2.2) with a threaded mpm - I assume you ran the worker model? While that is popular for deployments for many good reasons, it's not a fair comparison to what Mina does. Other than that keep up the great work :) -h
