sounds great! I will keep my eye on this project for future updates and will revisit this soon. -- ..Cheers Mark
On 9/19/07, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just committed it, it's compiling, a bit working, but it's not really > for production usage (or any usage actually :D).Trustin is going to > refactor AbstractIoProcessor > > The APR goal is to be portable on Unix and non Unix OSes, so there is > no Unix Domain socket :( > > Perhaps a great idea whould be a to produce IOPrcessor working with a > homemade library using epoll for achieving great perfs on linux for > TCP, UDP, files, serial, Unix Domain Socket, Audio, pipes , whatever > I/O using a file descriptor :) > > Or if APR perfs are goods, adding Unix Domain support to APR. > > Julien > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:51:31 > -0400 Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Julien, > > > > I just saw that the APR code you wrote is in the trunk. Let me know > > if you want to try and get it to support Unix Domain Sockets if it > > does not already. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > On 9/14/07, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:02:25 -0400 > > > Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I am looking to write a provider that performs NIO on a Unix > > > > Domain Socket. This would be used to communicate between JVMs on > > > > the same box and do it in a way that is faster than TCP. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > My APR based connector is starting purring. TCP & UDP are supported > > > (I think SCTP too but I made no test). Perhaps I can force/modify > > > APR for supporting Unix domain socket. Unix socket can be very > > > usefull too for communication between a C prog and a Java one, but > > > I'm not sure nowadays loopback UDP is really slower than Unix > > > sockets. > > > > > > Julien > > > >
