On 9/25/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it make sense to multiplex a Selector across multiple channels in > order to efficiently manage threads since you can have multiple channels > being monitored by one selector. You could have 10 channels, 1 selector in > the main thread and 1 I/O thread. Currently, 10 channels would mean 10 > selectors each in their own thread.
Yes, that's what I am saying. By managing a global pool of selectors and I/O processors, we could optimize thread usage. Cheers, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
