No, not yet. It's must to have in 2.0 though. :) Cheers, Trustin
On 9/25/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as the size of the pool could = 1. > > Has any work been done on this? > > Thanks Trustin. > > -- > ..Cheers > Mark > > On 9/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 9/25/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wouldn't it make sense to multiplex a Selector across multiple channels > > in > > > order to efficiently manage threads since you can have multiple channels > > > being monitored by one selector. You could have 10 channels, 1 selector > > in > > > the main thread and 1 I/O thread. Currently, 10 channels would mean 10 > > > selectors each in their own thread. > > > > Yes, that's what I am saying. By managing a global pool of selectors > > and I/O processors, we could optimize thread usage. > > > > Cheers, > > Trustin > > -- > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > -- > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > -- > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 > > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
