On Nov 19, 2007 10:19 PM, Irving, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't see a use case where I want *not* to call normalize() > > and break HTTP compatibility... but I don't have enough imagination :) > > Me neither. I'd think you'd want normalize() always being called in the > codec.
Great to see you in the mailing list. :) I've just added a call to MutableHttpRequest.normalize() in HttpRequestEncoder. Cheers, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
