On Nov 27, 2007 1:24 AM, monika7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trustin Lee wrote: > > > > On Nov 19, 2007 10:19 PM, Irving, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > I don't see a use case where I want *not* to call normalize() > >> > and break HTTP compatibility... but I don't have enough imagination :) > >> > >> Me neither. I'd think you'd want normalize() always being called in the > >> codec. > > > > Great to see you in the mailing list. :) > > > > I've just added a call to MutableHttpRequest.normalize() in > > HttpRequestEncoder. > > > > > > > > There is also a normalize() method available for MutableHttpResponse - will > this one also be called in the codec?
You have to call MutableHttpResponse.normalize by yourself because it needs parameter that the encoder doesn't have access to. HTH, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
