On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:25:14 -0800 "Cameron Taggart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But why? JDK logging is always available. It's the responsibility of > > any good logging framework that has existed since 2001 to install a JDK > > LogManager in my opinion. > > Do you know of a LogManager that can be used for slf4j? I asked about > one on their mailing list last May. It is a missing piece to the > puzzle that would benefit both java.util.logging and slf4j. > > http://www.slf4j.org/pipermail/user/2007-May/000349.html > > Cameron Well, slf4j is just a logging facade, isn't it? So you'd want to delegate to the underlying framework? You probably could do a LogManager that delegates to slf4j though. If things go well at work, we will soon have a public project that implements this and many other small useful LogManagers - delegating to log4j for sure. I never thought about delegating to a facade, but I guess it could work as long as the facade doesn't delegate back to JDK logging. :) - DML
