On Thursday 13 December 2007 18:26:38 Trustin Lee wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 2:05 AM, Luc Willems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 13 December 2007 03:50:14 Trustin Lee wrote: > > > This issue is becoming a real headache even a bottle of tylenol can't > > > fix, along with the reentrant logging issue: http://xrl.us/bctaa > > > > > > I think these two issues should be considered together to resolve the > > > issues related with logging. Let me summarize current situation: > > > > > > 1) There are people (A) who don't want to use SLF4J but > > > java.util.logging. 2) There are people (B) who like to use SLF4J and > > > they say SLF4J supports java.util.logging along with log4j. > > > 3) People A say java.util.logging can also do the same by employing a > > > proper LogManager implementation. > > > 4) There is a logger reentrance problem in MINA, which means it is > > > difficult to write a MINA-based appender for the most logging > > > frameworks that doesn't allow reentrance. This problem can be worked > > > around by turning off logging in MINA, but this is not reasonable. > > > > to make the picture a bit "complexer" . there is also a dependancy > > to apache commons-logging if you use the JMX classes. > > > > IoServiceBean depends on beanutils which uses commons-logging. > > i don't know how "hard" this dependancy is to beanutils. if we could > > remove this dependancy , it would reduce the dependancy list. > > > > It would be great that we had 1 logging framework to setup (which could > > be used with JDK java.util.loggig or log4j) > > I thought I got rid of that dependency recently, no? > > Thanks for the feed back anyway, > Trustin
the HttptestCase java that if created uses the JMX classes to monitor the traffic. i use bean-utils 1.8.beta (latest release)
