Thanks for the information... On Jan 22, 2008 12:15 PM, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark wrote: > > Niklas, > > > > Are these codecs that you mention (POP3, SMTP, IMAP) publicly available > > right now? > > > > Thanks > > > > Hi Mark, > > No they are not publicly available at the moment. As I mention below > there are some MINA based open source projects I'm aware of which > implement SMTP and POP3. Maybe they can provide what you are looking for? > > If you're looking for SMTP you could have a look at SubEthaSMTP, > http://subethasmtp.tigris.org/. They have a MINA codec for SMTP commands > based on MINA's text codec. Also, HausMail, > http://hausmail.safehaus.org/, has code to decode POP3 and SMTP > commands. HausMail doesn't seem to use ProtocolCodecFilter but rather a > custom decoder filter. > > HTH > > /Niklas > > > > > On Jan 21, 2008 3:03 AM, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Trustin Lee wrote: > >> > >>> Okay. Then it's time for restructuring. (Excited :) We have > >>> ftpserver, AHC and Asyncweb. FtpServer and AsyncWeb are under > >>> sandbox, but I think FtpServer is mature enough to bring it up to the > >>> subproject right away because Niklas G is working on the project and > >>> Niclas Hedman told me it's pretty mature project. > >>> > >>> So... I'd like to suggest the following directory structure: > >>> > >>> / - mina - trunk > >>> - tags > >>> - branches > >>> - ahc - trunk > >>> - tags > >>> - branches > >>> - ftpserver - trunk > >>> - tags > >>> - branches > >>> > >>> Does it make sense, or would you suggest better structure? > >>> > >>> > >> It makes sense I think! Would we still keep codec implementations in > >> subprojects under mina/ (like filter-codec-http)? I think that's a nice > >> separation. It would be great if the codec parts of ftpserver could be > >> separated from its use in ftpserver and become filter-codec-ftp. Is > that > >> doable? > >> > >> I think it would be very cool if MINA could be a repository for codec > >> implementations like this and I think that has been your intention from > >> the very start Trustin, right? We (Trillian AB) would be willing to > >> contribute initial (and in some areas incomplete) codec implementations > >> for POP3, SMTP and IMAP. I know there are others out there using MINA > >> for various types of mail servers and clients. Together we could build > >> complete and very usable implementations for these protocols. > >> > >> > >>> Also we could give some nicer name to AHC. What about Superluminal? > >>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light) > >>> > >>> > >> I like that name! Of course we would have to live up to it as well! :-) > >> > >> /Niklas > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Niklas Therning > www.spamdrain.net > -- -------------------------------- Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
