I'm actually not sure if CIDR submasks can be used for IPv6 addresses. I am also not really used to IPv6 yet. :)
At least for IPv4 addresses, I believe CIDR submask is what users want. 2008-03-13 (목), 08:42 +0100, Niklas Gustavsson 쓰시길: > Now, this is certainly not my area of expertise so bare with me. Isn't > CIDR submasks only for IP4 addresses? Also, they can not represent any > range in IP4 but blocking on subnets is probably what users need, > right? > > /niklas > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:13 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By using submask, we can merge blacklist range and blacklist, because a > > single IP address can be represented with 32-bit submask (i.e. > > 192.168.10.25/32 = 192.168.10.25). > > > > 2008-03-12 (수), 20:39 -0400, Mark Webb 쓰시길: > > > > > Couple points to make: > > > > > > 1. Why make a blacklist range and a blacklist. Why not just add the > > > range to the blacklist? > > > 2. Should there be more synchronizing of the adding/removing and the > > > check for blocked addresses? What happens if an add and a check for a > > > blocked address happen at the same time? > > > > > > --Mark > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Niklas Gustavsson > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Cool, so I'll add it and ask for a review when its in SVN. > > > > > > > > Alright, the code is in (rev 636538), have a go at it. I'm particulary > > > > interested in a review of the IP comparison code, not sure I got it > > > > correct. > > > > > > > > /niklas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > > -- > > what we call human nature is actually human habit > > -- > > http://gleamynode.net/ > > -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
