I don't know if it's related or not, but a bug was fixed recently where byte buffer expansion was much slower than it should have been. If you're using expandable byte buffers, you might want to check out the svn trunk and test with that.
Cheers, Craig > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Johns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:00 AM > To: mina > Subject: mina2.0.0-M1 vs mina1.1.6 > > I used both mina1.1.6 and mina2.0.0-M1(replaced mina1.1.6 and didn't > change > any other codes) to make two servers which are both connected to same data > source. Two same clients connected to these two servers. I observed the > client connected mina2.0.0-M1 receiving much slower(maybe missing) than > mina1.1.6 under heavy loading. (8000messages/sec). WhenI stopped playing > my > data source, client A received less messages than client B did. All > programs > were on the same machine. I wonder if any critical algorithmn was changed > in > mina2.0.0-M1? I saw one thread mentioning about M2 write slow issue. Any > idea?
