(FASTER) 1. Client A -> Server with mina1.1.6 -> data source server C (8000messages/sec) (much SLOWER) 2. Client B -> Server with mina2.0.0 -> data source server C I may try more clients and tell you the result. On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:04 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which client was connected MINA 2, Client A or B? > > There was huge refactoring in MINA 2, so there can be differences in > performance characteristics. However, I don't think I have changed any > critical algorithm. > > What would happen if you increase the number of simultaneous clients? > > Steve Johns wrote: > > I used both mina1.1.6 and mina2.0.0-M1(replaced mina1.1.6 and didn't > change > > any other codes) to make two servers which are both connected to same > data > > source. Two same clients connected to these two servers. I observed the > > client connected mina2.0.0-M1 receiving much slower(maybe missing) than > > mina1.1.6 under heavy loading. (8000messages/sec). WhenI stopped playing > my > > data source, client A received less messages than client B did. All > programs > > were on the same machine. I wonder if any critical algorithmn was > changed in > > mina2.0.0-M1? I saw one thread mentioning about M2 write slow issue. Any > > idea? > > > > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > >
