It sounds like MINA 2 performs better when there's no data source server access. Did I get it right? :)
Then.. that's very weird. What do you use to communicate with the data source server? Do you use MINA there too (i.e. IoConnector in IoHandler)? Steve Johns wrote: > (FASTER) 1. Client A -> Server with mina1.1.6 -> data > source server C (8000messages/sec) > (much SLOWER) 2. Client B -> Server with mina2.0.0 -> data source server C > I may try more clients and tell you the result. > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:04 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Which client was connected MINA 2, Client A or B? > > There was huge refactoring in MINA 2, so there can be differences in > performance characteristics. However, I don't think I have changed any > critical algorithm. > > What would happen if you increase the number of simultaneous clients? > > Steve Johns wrote: > > I used both mina1.1.6 and mina2.0.0-M1(replaced mina1.1.6 and > didn't change > > any other codes) to make two servers which are both connected to > same data > > source. Two same clients connected to these two servers. I > observed the > > client connected mina2.0.0-M1 receiving much slower(maybe missing) > than > > mina1.1.6 under heavy loading. (8000messages/sec). WhenI stopped > playing my > > data source, client A received less messages than client B did. > All programs > > were on the same machine. I wonder if any critical algorithmn was > changed in > > mina2.0.0-M1? I saw one thread mentioning about M2 write slow > issue. Any > > idea? > > > > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > > -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
