Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org>wrote:
just before leaving, I think that the first step should be to move Vysper
from labs to MINA sandbox. Then a bit of IP clearance should be done (mainly
checking if the jars are license compatible), plus some degree of
mavenization and headers cleaning would be necessary, and last, not least, a
general formating (using MINA code formatter) and we are golden.

Don't the folks over at labs do IP vetting?

I think they do, but I agree that it might we worth rechecking after
the project is moved to MINA.
There is nothing such as IP vetting in labs, IFAIK. However, as labs are reserved for committers, I guess that those who have a labs already know about this IP issue.
However, looking at the Labs site, I found this description of lab
project states:
http://labs.apache.org/faq.html#q7

They seem to assume that projects go to the incubator after labs,
rather directly to a project like MINA. I do not subscribe to the labs
list, could someone who does confirm that we would be allowed to move
the code directly to MINA?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200809.mbox/%3c48c64112.4020...@rowe-clan.net%3e

So we can promote the project as a MINA sub-project, it seems.
If we can, I'll be happy to help out with the practicalities. Also, I
assume Bernd would need to be voted in as a MINA committer, right?
Right !


--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org


Reply via email to