On 3/1/10 6:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
Thoughts ?
Unless it breaks the system, i would say lets not loose our sleep
over this.
While I share the same opinion about the IoFuture hierarchy as you I
have the same sentiments as Ashish.
I'm afraid that we might have to fix the issue in 2.0.... Trust me,
i'm not pleased with this !
Fixing a bug is one thing. Reorganizing a code base a few days after
an attempted vote on its initial release is another.
I know :/ This is why I created a branch, in a desesperate attempt to
get rid of all those futures, instead of doing that in trunk. Now, it
was the end of a long and painful week, chasing many bugs in many
places, and I was turning in circle.
I *wish* we can fix the bug, without having to rewrite this part.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
