I agree with Edouard, much people not even waited but used (!) mina 2.0
in production. Our servers are working on mina 2.0 during ~1.5 years -
we use both connectors and acceptors.
In fact, 2.0 is not so bad as it seems to be ;) We just have some bugs
which should be fixed in 2.0. Otherwise people may think that mina will
never be released ;-(
Victor N
Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
There are months i'm thinking the same without daring to say so ...
The problem is that 1.x branches have been abandonned long time ago and much
people are indeed waiting for the release of this 2.0
how bad would it be to release it for the early adopters with a 'use it at your
own risk' warning and invite new comers to wait for a 3.0 preview ?
would it be acceptable for the community to say that we won't support it
extensively as our efforts will be concentrated on 3.0 ?
Maybe it's the right time to shake the anthill or maybe not ...
my 2 cents
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lun 1 Mars 2010, 18 h 45 min 02 s
Objet : Re: ConnectFuture confusion
On 3/1/10 6:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 6:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
Thoughts ?
Unless it breaks the system, i would say lets not loose our sleep over this.
While I share the same opinion about the IoFuture hierarchy as you I have the
same sentiments as Ashish.
I'm afraid that we might have to fix the issue in 2.0.... Trust me, i'm not
pleased with this !
Fixing a bug is one thing. Reorganizing a code base a few days after an
attempted vote on its initial release is another.
I know :/ This is why I created a branch, in a desesperate attempt to get rid
of all those futures, instead of doing that in trunk. Now, it was the end of a
long and painful week, chasing many bugs in many places, and I was turning in
circle.
I *wish* we can fix the bug, without having to rewrite this part.
Another alternative is to totally abandon 2.x. It was never officially
released. Just leave it as it is and work on the new 2.x
I'm also considering this option...
