+1
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 March 2013 18:44, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : > >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the > >>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? > >>> > >>> That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already > >>> has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not use OSGi). > >> Are you saying they embed both mina2 and mina3? > > > > That's something you can face, for instance if one embed ApacheDS (MINA > > 2) and MINA 1 in some old library. > > > > I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we are > > taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every one > > will have switched to another NIO lib in the mean time, but still ... ;-) > >> > > If you rename the Java package you also need to change the Maven > coordinates (and vice versa). > Otherwise there will be classloading issues. >
