Le 11/26/13 11:08 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit :
> I want to keep it because I don't like deleting stuff on the server that
> may be pushed somewhere else. That's why I prefer to keep it but in read
> only to make sure the current situation won't happen anymore.
> But if we cannot have a read only mode, then delete it.

AFAICT, deleting the branch when merged should keep the track of the
chanegs made on it before its delition, no ?


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com 

Reply via email to