Well branch has been delete (which I don't like). Can you rename a branch to be a tag with git ?
Jeff On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > If it should become necessary to mark a branch read-only, I would > suggest the following: > > Rename it as a tag; that's effectively what it has become - tags > should be immutable. > or > Rename it to xxx_READ_ONLY > > In each case it would probably be worthwhile to add a README file to > explain the rationale (and point to the mail thread). > > > On 27 November 2013 12:49, Jeff MAURY <[email protected]> wrote: > > Done > > > > Jeff > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Le 11/27/13 1:29 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I've rebased 2.0.8 into 2.0 and pushed it to the server. > >> > >> Ok, thanks. > >> > >> > Still have to either delete 2.0.8 branch or put it read only (it is > >> > possible to do it with a hook but it seems it is not possible to push > a > >> > hook) > >> > >> Just delete it. It's useless. > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Cordialement, > >> Emmanuel Lécharny > >> www.iktek.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Jeff MAURY > > > > > > "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually > > working and scaling. > > - Bjarne Stroustrup > > > > http://www.jeffmaury.com > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com > > http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury > -- Jeff MAURY "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling. - Bjarne Stroustrup http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
